W Power 2024

An Absolutely Correct Balance Sheet is Impossible

An auditor, who has seen the inner workings of corporate balance sheets from up close, takes us inside that secret world on the condition that we don’t out him

Published: Mar 4, 2010 12:04:38 AM IST
Updated: Mar 4, 2010 06:57:12 AM IST
An Absolutely Correct Balance Sheet is Impossible
Image: Vidyanand Kamat

To folks from the Humanities, your job seems such a bore. What excites you about auditing?
I have been in this business for 20 years. I don’t think that it is a bore at all. People who say so most likely don’t have any idea what it consists of.

To me, the rush comes from the fact that every year, I perform under an increasing amount of public scrutiny.

How many companies’ accounts actually present a true picture?
The word ‘true’ is very problematic and subtle. To have an absolutely correct balance statement is impossible. There are always different standpoints from which it can be viewed, and it should be fair to all parties. One must make sure that the point of view of the user of the balance sheet is taken into account.

What is the worst form of manipulation you have come across while auditing a company’s
accounts?

I have not come across any blatantly illegal financial statements. But there are areas where subjectivity can mar judgement, like when a valuation has to be done of a work in progress or stock or inventory valuation.

What is the most common malpractice?
I have only heard of goods going out of factories without an invoice, etc. but there is often a great deal of debate about what bracket of excise tax the business fits in.

What about hospitality offered to you when you go to a company as an external auditor? Did you accept them?
On the contrary, most big companies are extremely frugal — they offer just a basic meal every day. We get a great deal of respect, but no extravagant gifts.

Was the Satyam scandal a shock within auditing circles? Has it changed things?
No one had an idea that such shocking transactions were taking place. But I am a believer in the overall prudence of India Inc. I feel this was an aberration.

Things have become a lot more rigorous after Satyam. There is a new awareness of approach and method that has come in. There is more emphasis on documentation now.

Confidentiality is expected from auditors. How difficult is it to maintain?
This is something that is ingrained into the system right from the beginning. People are pulled up for talking loosely and not being careful about sensitive client information.

(As told to Divya Subramaniam)

Next issue, our Insider will be a Tiger conservationist. So, if you have a question for him, email us — ask.forbesindia@network18online.com — or write to Ask The Insider at our office address, and we’ll get it answered for you. You’re also welcome to send us suggestions on the kind of “insiders” you would like to hear from in the future.

(This story appears in the 19 March, 2010 issue of Forbes India. To visit our Archives, click here.)

Post Your Comment
Required
Required, will not be published
All comments are moderated
  • Amey

    Differentiate the principle of materiality against conservatism?

    on Aug 19, 2010
  • Amey

    Do you believe that all amounts appearing in financial statements are absolutely correct? Explain...

    on Aug 19, 2010