A journalist for 18 years, I have been writing on business with special focus on automobiles, commodities and management. Corporate stories are my forte but that has not restricted me from writing on diverse subjects such as sports (especially Formula 1), films, music and so on...
It was in 2006 that the then Finance Minister P Chidambaram mooted the idea of a Goods and Services Tax (GST)—a simplified and efficient indirect tax that would subsume myriad taxes levied by the central and state governments, allow the free movement of goods across the country and remove the present tax regime’s cascading effect on the supply chain. It took 10 years for political consensus to emerge and The Constitution (122nd Amendment) (GST) Bill, 2014, was finally passed unanimously in both Houses of Parliament recently. India is thus closer to becoming one unified market. But the country’s biggest tax reform also forces the central and state governments to give up something they hold very dear to their heart—the independence to levy taxes.
The road ahead for GST is critical, if not as onerous, as the distance already travelled. For the tax to deliver the benefit it purports to, certain critical decisions must be taken in the coming days.
The most crucial is the tax rate. “A high rate will be inflationary,” says Ajit Ranade, chief economist at Aditya Birla Group. He suggests retaining the present service tax rate of 15 percent as the central rate. Anything more could fuel inflation, he warns. A consensus on what the rate should be is likely to be the biggest challenge for the government. Chief Economic Adviser (CEA) Arvind Subramanian has arrived at 18 percent as the ideal rate, but the states are demanding it be capped at 20 percent, fearing a sharp fall in their revenue.
Ranade disagrees with both views. “The CEA’s calculation is inherently flawed as it does not take into account the buoyancy that the levy will generate,” he says. “When VAT was introduced, similar fears surfaced, but in the end, tax collections increased and the need to compensate states for revenue shortfall never arose.”
The Congress party has been demanding a moderate rate and Chidambaram has repeatedly stressed that indirect taxes are regressive (as it taxes people irrespective of their income) and must be kept low, whereas direct taxes should be kept higher.