Yes Bank's quarter of woes

Fresh concerns over the bank's growth prospects have emerged after it reported its highest ever quarterly net loss (₹1,507 crore) and 51 percent rise in slippages at ₹3,481 crore

Salil Panchal
Published: May 6, 2019 02:31:43 PM IST
Updated: May 6, 2019 03:20:38 PM IST

Life is not a template and neither is mine. Like several who have worked as journalists, I am a generalist in my over two decade experience across print, global news wires and dotcom firms. But there has been one underlying theme in each phase; life gave me the chance to observe and tell a story -- from early days tracking a securities scam to terror attacks and some of India's most significant court trials. Besides writing, I have jumped fences to become an entrepreneur, as an investment advisor -- and also taught the finer aspects of business journalism to young minds. At Forbes India, I also keep an eye on some of its proprietary specials like the Rich list, GenNext and Celebrity lists. An alumnus of Xavier Institute of Communications and H.R College of Commerce and Economics in Mumbai, I have worked for organisations such as Agence France-Presse, Business Standard, The Financial Express and The Times of India prior to this.

g_115655_yesbank_rts229ih_280x210.jpgImage: Francis Mascarenhas / Reuters

One would have thought the worst was over for Yes Bank after former Deutsche Bank’s India head Ravneet Gill replaced Rana Kapoor as its MD and CEO in January. But fresh concerns over the bank’s growth prospects have emerged after it reported its highest ever quarterly net loss (₹1,507 crore) and 51 percent rise in slippages at ₹3,481 crore. The stock was downgraded by several equity analysts, with 20 out of 26 brokerage outfits giving either a ‘sell, underperform or reduce’ rating.

Post-earnings the stock fell by 42 percent to a low of ₹160 at the BSE. “The biggest concern is whether the management’s guidance on credit costs is credible,” says Hemindra Hazari, an independent banking analyst who publishes his writings on Singapore-based research platform Smartkarma. The bank has guided over a watchlist of ₹10,000 crore, making a provisioning for ₹2,100 crore on this.

Gill says the media has misinterpreted the disclosures, stating that it is only a watchlist and “still performing” assets, mainly in the real estate, media and entertainment and infrastructure sectors. But what is unclear is how many of these assets may turn bad. History has shown, as in the case with other banks, that it would not take time for a standard asset to turn into an NPA in a tough business cycle. “Q1 FY20 is expected to be poor on account of stressed loans slipping to NPAs,” says Hazari. 

Motilal Oswal Securities gave a ‘buy’ rating for the stock after the weak earnings, calling it ‘a tough start to a fruitful journey’ in a report. 

Gill is betting on a rise in revenues through retail and transactional banking, but what will be most critical is how it manages prudent accounting norms and acts on warning signals relating to NPAs.

(This story appears in the 24 May, 2019 issue of Forbes India. You can buy our tablet version from Magzter.com. To visit our Archives, click here.)

Show More
Post Your Comment
Required
Required, will not be published
All comments are moderated
Storyloom Films make short films to shine light on preserving ancient Indian craft
Jet Airways: How Naresh Goyal lost the plot