What Went Wrong With the Aakash Tablet

The disastrous Aakash project has expunged India's dream of developing the world's cheapest computing device. And questions remain unanswered

By Seema Singh
Published: Jun 25, 2012
LOST CAUSE Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal
displays the low-cost computing device during its unveiling in New Delhi on July 22, 2010
Image: Reuters
LOST CAUSE Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal displays the low-cost computing device during its unveiling in New Delhi on July 22, 2010

Imagine for a moment you’re a scientist looking at a stubborn problem—in this case, a mass of a few hundred million poor, uneducated people. To lift them out of poverty, friends who study economics tell you the first thing you ought to do is offer them access to affordable education. And that if you can, you’ll achieve three things. Create a better world; create an incredibly compelling business; and perhaps get a stab at immortality.

There are two ways to go about the problem. The first, you reckon you ought to think through the problem. That means look at the world around you, tinker with ideas, figure what works best, and build a cost-effective solution that eventually helps achieve the objectives stated above.

The second is a pig-headed one. Look at how others around the world are attempting to crack the problem; call in the global media; tell them a tablet-like device with a touch screen can be built and sold at $35; another matter altogether you’ve got no clue how to go about it or why; and then try your damndest best for a stab at glory. In any case, as long as the problem is cracked, who gives a damn?

With the benefit of hindsight, it is now obvious the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) chose the pig-headed option. What else explains the fact that almost two years ago, the ministry announced it is in the middle of developing a low-cost computing device for students that would cost just $35? And that when complete, a global tender for five million units of the device would be floated? The blitz that accompanied the announcement had the world in a tizzy.

A little less than a year later, in February 2011, the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Jodhpur, which had taken upon itself the onus to decide what specifications this animal would run on, put out a global tender to build the first 10,000 units. In return for these services, the institution received Rs 47 crore from the government. DataWind, a 12-year-old Canadian company with subsidiaries in the UK and India won the contract, produced a prototype built to spec, and Kapil Sibal, the minister in charge of MHRD, unveiled Aakash, the world’s cheapest computing device.

To put it mildly, the prototype was a disaster. Some phones in the market worked faster than this contraption. The battery couldn’t last two hours if a user tried to play video files on it. The touch screen, well, wasn’t “touchy” enough. And things got ugly between IIT Jodhpur and DataWind. Sibal finally stepped in and in early April this year announced that an upgraded version of the device will be made available by May.

As this story goes to press, we’re in the middle of June. Aakash-2 is still being tested by C-DAC in Thiruvananthapuram; IIT Bombay has been appointed the new nodal institution to drive the project and officials there claim 100,000 units will be supplied for pilot tests by October this year.
On its part, DataWind claims the 100,000 units have already been supplied to the institute. Nobody seems to have a clue what the truth is. What we know is this: Similar computing devices with superior capabilities are being brought out of Chinese factories by the thousands; India seems to have lost the plot; and what could have been an incredibly compelling story is now a stillborn.

The race to build the world’s cheapest computing device started when the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project was announced in 2005. Headed by Nicholas Negroponte, best known as the founder of MIT’s Media Labs, it was a non-profit entity and funded by global majors like AMD, Google and Nortel among others. The central theme to this idea was to build a laptop that would cost no more than $100.

But Negroponte was not a pig-headed man. He was clear that while keeping costs low was important, it wasn’t the central objective. Instead, it was to make sure technology and resources could be delivered to schools in the least developed countries. He wasn’t hung up on the $100 number. He knew that costs could go up by $30-40 or even $100. For various reasons though, a laptop at $100 was the number that stuck in the minds of people across the world—including NK Sinha, joint secretary at the MHRD.

While the OLPC project has gone through many ups and downs including funders backing out, NK Sinha proposed the MHRD develop a laptop at $10—one-tenth of the price the OLPC had proposed.

UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS NK Sinha, joint secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, proposed that the ministry develop a laptop at $10
Image: Courtesy:PIB
UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS NK Sinha, joint secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, proposed that the ministry develop a laptop at $10

On the back of this proposal, in November 2006, a government release said several institutions, including the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) and IIT Madras, would develop “a very low-cost and low power-consuming access device to address the challenges of providing broadband connectivity for every Indian, preferably free of cost for educational purposes.”

But N Balakrishnan, associate director at IISc, and Ashok Jhunjhunwala, electrical engineering professor at IIT Madras, say they don’t remember participating in any such project. On the contrary, sources we spoke to say all of India’s best engineering institutes declined to participate in the project because they thought it an unviable idea.

mg_65682_aakash_timeline_280x210.jpg
Then like a bolt out of the blue, in January 2009, Sinha announced the launch of the $10 computer in Tirupati. It was met with all-around sniggers because what it looked like was a pen drive with a screen and no features worth talking about. Sinha told us then that some students and faculty members had been working on it for over two years, they had applied for patents and that “…everything need not be told.”

Fact is, until now, everything hasn’t been told and questions remain unanswered.

● What happened to the intellectual property (IP) the $10 laptop project was supposed to generate?

● After the first meeting of the project coordinators, it was made clear “all IP created under the Mission would remain as jointly owned and copyrighted by the MHRD, the coordinating institutes and community of experts which create the IP.” But six years down the line, all IIT Jodhpur can show is that it zeroed in on the specifications, floated a tender and selected the lowest bidder on behalf of the government. What happened in the interim and why wasn’t any IP generated by the institute?

● How did DataWind, with far fewer resources at its disposal than all of the might at the ministry’s disposal, manage to create a tablet that retails in the market under the brand name UbiSlate at a price point much higher than $35? DataWind’s CEO says it was done without using any IP that came from the government-funded project.

Even if one were to be charitable and dispense with these questions, it is impossible to ignore the fact that Aakash isn’t a device that can be used to study on. “The educational experience has to be captured and ought to be central to the design of the entire software platform for the device. I see no such effort. Running a few apps that can show YouTube and a few file formats does not make an educational device. There is no integration of a core idea into the device,” says V Vinay, a former computer science professor from IISc who recently founded LimberLink Technologies to enhance and improve engineering curriculum.

A device that enables ‘studying’ is built differently from one designed for ‘reading’. You can read a novel. But when it comes to studying, say physics, a student ought to be able to read on the device, make notes on it and work out answers to a problem. “Aakash is a disaster,” says a newly retired vice chancellor of one of the largest technological universities in the country. “Without taking a long-term view of the end use of the device…it will remain ineffective.” Ashok S Kolaskar, former vice chancellor of Pune University and KIIT University in Bhubaneswar, calls the content that is being digitised by the MHRD “19th century textbooks in audio and video format.”

If the project has to take any shape, then the obsession with pricing will have to be given up. But it remains sacrosanct. “The price point is the biggest deal,” says a member of the standing committee on National Mission on Education through Information, Communication and Technology (ICT).  “It’s one man’s vision,” says Suneet Singh Tuli, chief executive of DataWind. The only problem with the vision: The Chinese have already cracked the price barrier. And for all practical purposes, are close to commoditising the market. Clinging on to an unrealistic price and the ‘Made in India’ tag have ensured the project was stillborn six years ago. What got lost out was an opportunity to rally resources and build a well engineered device.

In contrast to this fiasco is the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD). For the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, it needed tablets in large numbers. It turned to defence equipment maker Bharat Electronics, which had lost the original race to DataWind.

It developed the device in four months and delivered 640,000 tablets in six months to the MoRD, three times the number of tablets sold in the Indian consumer market in 2011. But company officials fear that the unsustainable pricing being demanded by Sinha will keep serious manufacturers away from taking a serious jab at building tablets.

Experts say when the proposal was originally floated, several startups had queued up before Sinha. While on the one hand he encouraged them to come up with prototypes, on the other he discouraged them saying the IITs were developing the devices at a price point of $32. Every time a startup approached him, it was asked to deliver in “two months”. “He had a huge stack of tablets in his room. He’d reel out component prices from Taiwan without revealing much,” says a senior professional who interacted with him.

For startups like AllGo Embedded Systems, a six-year old company founded by ex-IISc students, some “enablement” from the ministry (an indication of commitment to procure) would have helped. But they say Sinha insists vendors cannot buy and supply directly. For the product to meet his standards, it’s got to be assembled locally, which in turn drives prices higher.

Larger manufacturers like HCL Infosystems are watching the drama unfold, albeit from a distance. Earlier this year, it launched a tablet called MyEdu. Though it says it was “never in the race” for Aakash, sources say it backed out during pre-bid discussions due to the ministry’s insistence on keeping prices low. “The idea [of Aakash] was really great; it created a lot of buzz in the market and a lot of confusion in the minds of people as users do look for a brand, support and quality,” says Anand Ekambaram of HCL Infosystems.

Despite several email and phone requests, Sinha was not available for comment. However, academics associated with the project stand by him and argue that the volumes a project of this kind can generate will make up for the low price point Sinha is insisting on. But vendors who signed on to provide laptops at Rs 15,000 each under the chief minister’s ‘one laptop per student’ programme in Tamil Nadu, which aims to distribute 6.8 million machines over five years, are already finding the going tough and have written to the state government that they may find it difficult to sustain their commitments, says Vishal Tripathi, an analyst with research firm Gartner.

“My fear is not so much the money we waste on these pursuits; the Indian government is not known for fiscal prudence in any case,” says LimberLink’s Vinay. He worries about the damage it can do to children. “Instead of giving them the learning they deserve, they get a phony experience as education, which will be tragic.”

In his satirical novel The First $20 Million Is Always The Hardest, a spoof on Silicon Valley of the late 1990s, technology and culture writer Po Bronson took pot shots at the concept of a sub-$300 PC. The plot revolves around a plan to build a low cost device. Much like Aakash, the protagonist in the book Andy Casper sets the rule for his team: The PC has to hit the stores at $300.

The book was published in 1995 when PC prices hovered around $2500. “There was nothing magical about that figure [$300], no technological reason for sticking to that price,” writes Bronson. But conventional wisdom suggested that for a consumer product to reach a critical mass of homes, its price had to match other small home appliances.

When a colleague suggests to Casper that the goal looks hopeless, he blurts: “Stop thinking about the big picture. Just work on one part at a time.” But the outcomes of the prototype sound eerily similar to Aakash. Emagi (electronic magic) as it was called, never looked and felt right. And something always seemed to go wrong with it. Did somebody say prescient?

How Bharat Electronics did it

mg_65680_handa_280x210.jpg
Image: Mallikarjun Katakol for Forbes India
SUCCESSFUL BID Mannmohan Handa,general manager of export manufacturing,Bharat Electronics

When the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) was getting ready for its door-to-door survey for the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, it was looking for ways to reduce cost and enhance data authenticity. It took inspiration from the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD)—its quest for low-cost tablets had been hitting the headlines. MoRD approached Bharat Eletronics (BEL), which had lost the MHRD tender. Once the need and specs were decided, orders came in quickly, on June 10. By December 2011, BEL delivered 600,000 7-inch tablets to MoRD, and an additional 40,000 units in January 2012. It cost $72, whereas the MHRD was seeking a price tag of $35.
That was a record of sorts, recalls Mannmohan Handa, general manager of export manufacturing. Handa was pleased with his team, which worked even on holidays, and in three shifts, almost like a “relay race”. “It was not a typical public sector working; [it was a] totally private sector environment.”

Handa’s unit also makes electronic voting machines, but for these tablets, it accelerated the processes, applying all techniques of lean manufacturing, e-procurement and e-testing. Several BEL agencies worked closely to provide application software support for data enumeration, secure data storage, secure data access and transmission. Additionally, it provides foldable solar charging stations and an extra battery pack that lasts eight hours. Handa says this project has opened a new vista for BEL. Will it bid for Aakash-2? That depends on the top management, but the bid should add to the company’s bottom line—near-zero profits aren’t attractive.


(With additional reporting by Rohin Dharmakumar)
 

 

Correction: This article has been updated with a correction. In our earlier statement on 2nd page's last paragraph "They say when the proposal was originally floated, several startups had queued up before Sinha" the word 'They' has been replaced with 'Experts' to remove any confusion on attribution of the source of the statement.

forbeslife_20160718113824_150x195.jpg

(This article is excerpted from the latest Forbes India 06 July, 2012 issue which is now available at news stands and book stores. You can buy our tablet version from Magzter.com)

Show More
  • Chandan Mishra

    Why IIT Jodhpur was given the responsibility to put the specifications into it when it was still finding its foot to establish itself. IIT Kanpur, Delhi, Mumbai which are more established and the professors there are more experienced should have been given the role at first. There\'s definitely something fishy when IIT Jodhpur was given the responsibility.

    on Sep 6, 2012
    • Gourab

      so u wanna tell dat who r not established there shud not be given chance to improve dem selves.....and u keep in mind dat all da professors who r in new iits r da experienced professors of other old iits......so dont write if u dont know da matter properly......

      on Nov 23, 2012
  • Sohag

    N K Sinha is additional secretary mhrd not joint

    on Aug 8, 2012
  • Uma Dongre

    Find an impractical idea. Find politicians who believe in it. Find dumb taxpayers. Mission accomplished.

    on Jul 24, 2012
  • Pe_2010

    students need good teachers, not tablets and laptops. that is the flaw in the basic assumption. these efforts should have been spent on figuring out how to hire good teachers and make them stay in govt schools. needless to say, the iits are hardly the best place to ask, since you don\'t know if a person got in thru actual merit or quota.

    on Jul 15, 2012
  • Sr

    Story shows a well balanced reasoning of how things have unfolded. Creating media hype without proving value and worth often acts against (even in cases where a genuine effort is being made). Aakash does seem to have been a genuine effort by Sibal. The problem has perhaps been in the way its been handled prematurely. We in India seem to get overboard too soon. Does this mean the death of Aakash dream by Sibal? Perhaps not and it should not be regardless of Aakash or no Aakash. There are others who are doing good work and are creating good devices without creating hype. Offering accessible computing and communication devices is the need of the hour in India.

    on Jul 4, 2012
  • Satyaakam

    Medianama filed a RTI to get details here is the report http://www.medianama.com/2012/05/223-aakash-tablet-rti-college-datawind/ , OLPC has its own set of issues , no local community support , high cost of import , claims and news inserts which again has no use except creating the initial paraphernalia , what works for some other countries never would work for a country like India . -Satya | Satyaakam.net

    on Jun 28, 2012
  • Bharat Kumar

    Even the BEL story isn\'t very good. Ask the companies who carried out cast census and they will tell you the gore.

    on Jun 27, 2012
    • Seema Singh

      @Bharat: If you can tell me who these companies are, then I will follow it up. You can either post some names here or mail me at seema.singh@network18online.com

      on Jun 27, 2012
  • Ron

    Biased views right from the begining! what you call a bighead idea is being appreciated by world bank experts too! The fact that the device is in the stage of testing proves that the govt is going very cautiously about it to ensure that the citizens get the best. OLPC has failed, and failed miserably!

    on Jun 27, 2012
    • Seema Singh

      @Ron: The story is not an endorsement of OLPC. Nor is the World Bank's appreciation (which probably only govt officials know) of Aakash an endorsement that all is well with the idea, execution and future of this device. The reason we call it pigheaded (not bigheaded) is that there wasn't any idea worth talking about all these years. Having goofed around for 6 yrs, and then when the prices have naturally crashed, getting hold of a company that can assemble it at the lowest price, isn't a vision. You are missing the larger point of the story- when you embark on a large mission like this - to give every college student a device - you take credible technologists on board and make a transparent case.

      on Jun 27, 2012
  • Karandeep Singh

    very nice tablet

    on Jun 26, 2012
  • Chandrashekhar

    Looking at the Twitter feed on your site, I feel sorry that stories like these are buried under Flipkart frenzy. This is an important issue and rarely do bureaucrats get singled out for big messes they create in their tenure. I\'m sure Mr Sinha is entitled for a promotion now. But anyway, it also highlights that newspapers/magazines write what sells and which is why we see coverage of low-hanging fruits in the media. Gone are the days of good investigative stories, at least in mainstream media.

    on Jun 26, 2012
  • Shudhanshu

    This is govt\'s own project and will take as much time as the govt, last:...........

    on Jun 26, 2012
  • Saurabh

    I cannot get over two comments on Aakash: One from a Secretary to the Govt of India: We made public invitation to guests. The guests have arrived. But our kitchen is empty and the cook is nowhere to be found. Sorry, guests!.. Other from Satish Jha of OLPC: MHRD has been prgnant a bit too long with "Sakshaat". Its miscarriage was announced in the birth of Aakash. The second pregnancy has lasted well beyond its term. Someone seems to have forgotten to announce the second miscarriage. N K Sinha should be tried out in an open court and charged with misleading the world for such a long time. Kapil Sibal is a politician who is used to lying day in and day out and surviving to tell another lie the next day. Clearly not a person we can trust our public policy with. It would have been nice if the article was conclusive and had also talked about how Aakash denied India's children an opportunity to use OLPC.

    on Jun 25, 2012
    • Seema Singh

      Saurabh@ Even though the concept of Aakash was inspired, if I can use that term, by OLPC, it was not meant for children; it was for college and university students. At least somewhere down the line it was explicitly announced by MHRD. So I can\'t say that it denied the Indian children the opportunity to use OLPC.

      on Jun 25, 2012
      • Nisha

        My sense is that you should be asking the Education Secretaries. Many believed Aakash was for children as well. I know that Anshu Vaish personally told so many chief secretaries NOT to try OLPC because Aakash was coming. And I may know just the tip of the iceberg. Its worth exploring if you still have interest in it. There is a huge scam behind Aakash and someone needs to dig it up. You are one of the few journalists who tried to get the facts but the total picture is a lot uglier.

        on Jun 27, 2012
  • Atul Kulkarni

    After a slow, rather opinionated start, the story gathers steam. You make your point, a fair one at that. But I'€™d still argue that is it fair to write it off when IIT-B has taken it under its wings? Do you have reasons to believe that things are still going out of hand?

    on Jun 25, 2012
  • Chinmaya Soman

    I think the Aakash tablet is something very diff to adjust with common man, as what the minister is unveiling in the launch show of tablet they haven't cheked for the pros & cons before the launch as it very necessary for the launch. Secondly what the goverment is trying to make some business out of it as it clearly mention in the statement of govt that this is purely non profit based scenario just to improve the education of the country, as poor among poor can take up the current education but the thing is lacking behind is that the person who is unable to have a 2 time meal a day what he ll purchase the cheap tablet for education, as in this is totally back out by the govt. I had read an article where the production has started in banglore and also delhi public school has distributed the tablet to the students of the school and after that govt demand the return of the tablet back to producer as it contains flaws with it, this is totally a weak system govt who dont know what to unveil and when to unveil as its save the money and manufacturing cost, same case happened with TATA NANO

    on Jun 25, 2012
  • Madhankumarps

    Currently INDIA need Education and food for Poor people. Not a fancy tablets, TVs, etc. Still peoples in INDIA don't have the basic facilities like water, food, cloth and education.Since all the politicians are rich and full of corruption everywhere,they don't meet poor people those who don't have the basic needs. They have to travel and live along with the people. Then only they solve the problems in INDIA, not by increasing export or by giving cheap tablets and free TV's, laptops.

    on Jun 25, 2012
  • Joshua Karthik

    Funny how I spoke to Suneet Singh Tuli in November 2011, when he was a speaker at TEDx Mumbai, and he seemed so confident that the press and the world and the thinking public had it wrong, and that he had it right. He rattled off numbers on stage that seemed to indicate that Datawind had indications of interest for volumes that were 10x the size of the current tablet market. I distinctly remember his insistence, on and off stage, that what they were doing was possible, was done, and that they were one step away from delivery. Sad.

    on Jun 25, 2012
Podcast: The Green Economy will not be a green wash if countries do their bit
Part 1: Edelweiss' Rashesh Shah talks about the strategy to success
You might also want to read...
next
prev
suggested stories