Nandini Sundar: The Path to a Conflict-Free State

Peace talks and punishing erring Special Police Officers are the key to solving the Naxal problem, says Nandini Sundar, Head of Department, Sociology, Delhi School of Economics

Published: Jan 26, 2012 06:24:13 AM IST
Updated: Jan 25, 2012 02:56:49 PM IST
Nandini Sundar: The Path to a Conflict-Free State
Image: Vikas Khot
BRUTAL FORCE Police personnel beat up a youth. The only way to proceed towards peace in trouble-torn areas is to start on the plank of justice

Contrary to the dominant narrative that areas where Naxalites are strong are where the state has been absent, for the last 100-150 years, there has been a gradual expansion of the state in tribal areas regardless of whether the people want it or not. However, the state has been expanding in the wrong areas. You have an extension of the forest department, the bureaucracy, the patwari and the forest guard. But at the same time there is no state presence in the form of school teachers, healthcare workers and other services.

The problem here is that the state only wants to take a military approach towards ending Naxalism. This will not work as it has been proven in the case of Kashmir and the North East. It may have ‘worked’ in Punjab, but that was because the people were already alienated from the militants. The criterion of success is also debatable because of the grave violations of human rights. In terms of a constitutional approach to conflict resolution, I wouldn’t say that was an approach that worked.

This attitude [of the government] is reflected in the CRPF [Central Reserve Police Force] programme of winning the hearts and minds of the people, as part of which the paramilitary gifts people lungis and saris. Ironically, the CRPF personnel beat up people if they don’t accept the gifts and people laugh as they recount this.

In Chhattisgarh, in the areas where Maoists are strong, there is no voting in the villages, and many of the sarpanches have joined the Salwa Judum. So, when development work is routed through the sarpanches, it has no relationship to anything on the ground. The sarpanches don’t even live in the villages, and invent paper schemes in collusion with the block officer. It’s a fantasy of development where the paperwork looks good, but no one’s heart or mind is being won. Much of this is also being shown for roadside villages which were never Judum-affected or Maoist-influenced in the first place, so that the figures look good. But the real areas that are affected remain unaddressed.

The only way to proceed towards establishing peace in Chhattisgarh is to start on the plank of justice. Three villages had been torched last year and in 2007. The interesting part here is that in 2007, the average losses [claimed by the tribals] per household was around Rs. 1 lakh, but due to the recent incidents [attacks on the tribals by the paramilitary], in many households, the figure is as low as Rs. 20,000 per household. It is evident that the Adivasis are not only under relentless attack, but are also becoming paupers.

In this context, it is not clear what role the integrated action plan announced by Jairam Ramesh will play. Where people have been killed and raped and houses burnt and they get no justice, will their hearts and minds be won through roads and panchayat bhawans? For their part, the villagers will accept state intervention if it is seen as a part of a justice package and not as part of counter-insurgency. We [activists fighting on behalf of the tribals in Chhattisgarh] had submitted a rehabilitation plan that precisely ensured this—through an enumeration of what had happened in each village and a transparent compensation and criminal registration process with an appropriate monitoring committee. But the governmen—both Centre and state—have kept stalling.

If the Centre is serious about bettering the situation in Chhattisgarh, first it needs to withdraw troops to the barracks and hold peace talks with the Naxalites. But that seems unlikely as they have killed Kishenji [Maoist leader]. The Maoists, for their part, must stop initiating attacks and renew expressions of interest in peace talks. As unlikely as the prospect seems, there is no other way, but talks. As for other steps, the onus lies on the government alone. The second thing that the Chhattisgarh government needs to do is to implement the Supreme Court order disbanding Special Police Officers [SPOs] in its spirit. The state government has today recruited the SPOs into the Chhattisgarh Armed Auxiliary Force and they continue to threaten people.

The SPOs are allowed a free run by the police. Today, the SPOs who have been recruited into the auxiliary force earn four times the salary they used to draw earlier. While they were paid Rs. 1,500 earlier as SPOs, these people today earn around Rs. 7,000. They are the ones to benefit the most out of our petition. This would be fine in terms of giving them security, but for this to be constitutional, the guilty ones among them have to be taken to task. Otherwise, what you have is the regularisation of criminals.

The government needs to ensure that justice is delivered to the people of Chhattisgarh. It also needs to implement our rehabilitation plan and file criminal cases. Today, you can be a mass murderer and get away with it whether in Gujarat 2002 or 2005 onwards in Chhattisgarh. Unless there is an end to impunity, and a movement for this, just like the movement against corruption, we will never see a conflict-free country.


What needs to be done
☛ End the military approach towards Naxalism.
☛ To establish peace, one needs to start on the plank of justice and start peace talks.
☛ Disband Special Police Officers who threaten locals with impunity.

(As told to K.P. Narayana Kumar)

Nandini Sundar is head of department, Sociology, Delhi School of Economics
 

(This story appears in the 03 February, 2012 issue of Forbes India. You can buy our tablet version from Magzter.com. To visit our Archives, click here.)

Show More
Post Your Comment
Required
Required, will not be published
All comments are moderated
  • Tribal Bychoice

    Nandini Sundar must answer - What has shaped the life of tribals such, as to make them appear poor despite being inhabitants of the richest region of India in terms of natural resources like forests and minerals? Only India's economic development is being hugely powered by the use of natural resources but why tribals'€™ socio-environmental wealth is being stereotyped as road blocks? Why only modernist education, health, housing, etc should be seen as development and not the environmentally conscious, co-harmonious learning and living be also treated with equal respect? Why urban way of alienated, insensitive, destructive life of millions living together is seen as advanced but mutually dignifying, trustworthy, creative life-scape of tribals is stamped as backward? Why only industrialized, patronizing behaviour be seen as progressive but tribal philosophy of live and let live seen as stagnant? Sorry Nandini but activists like you seem to be silly friends of tribals. Your way of solutions look only peaceful temporarily but in the longer run they will too unleash destruction of tribal way of life. In a mad world where modern education is not providing jobs to most of those who have worked at achieving it through decades or centuries; where healthy life is getting dependent on allopathic medicines, gym; where buying a four-walled room is becoming a life long struggle; can we say it honestly that we are thinking of improving tribals' life or the fact is that we want to see them become as wretched as us or may be worse? Yes, tribals have innumerable problems today but please assess genuinely and you will find that not at all for most troubles they can be blamed for their situation. It is both the modernist adventure of capitalists and dogmatism of communists which has turned the oldest inhabitants of planet earth into helpless citizens of 'nation-states'. Dear Prof. Sundar, as much we dislike success measured by rising stock markets, we equally are apprehensive of imposed so-called progressive agenda. Imagine a hypothetical situation €“ if one fine day our powers get swapped €“ and we impose on you to live like us and even force you to smile at it to show delight €“ will you accept gladly? Finally, wish to say that though we certainly admire your struggle against our contemporary marginalization and torture but we also hope that you will also earnestly think of valuing our dream of living the way we want to. The way to save a bird from a carnivorous is not by caging it in your home.

    on Jan 27, 2012
  • Suresh

    Media has this liberty of publishing pictures which are at least over 8 years old and hoodwinking the public! what damn does the public know! Only wishing someday wisdom gets the better of print-hooliganism!

    on Jan 27, 2012
Mohandas Pai: Skill Searching
Valerie Casey: You Make More Money if You go Green