True, it is the best-ever medal haul from India. A tally of four medals with one silver and three bronze is greater than the three won four years ago, but the absence of a gold makes it look thinner in quality. (India's challenge in wrestling was yet to begin at the time of writing this article for the magazine)
The Indian story of the Games may well be MC Mary Kom. This, in a manner of speaking, was her first and last shot at glory. She was the face her sport used to get women’s boxing into the Olympic agenda.
The 29-year-old mother of two has been candid enough to admit that she virtually lived to see the sport come to Olympic Games. And when it did, the federation and International Olympic Committee limited it to three weight categories—the lowest of which was still way above the one where Mary Kom had achieved all her glory.
Yet, Mary Kom was resilient enough to fight in a higher category. From 45 kg, where she began her career in 2001, she moved to 46 and then 48. At the Olympics she had to fight in the 51kg category. Shorter, and possessing metabolism that makes it difficult to gain weight, Mary Kom literally punched way above her weight.
She lost out to the eventual champion, Britain’s Nicola Adams. Still smiling in defeat, Mary Kom stole the hearts of 1.2 billion Indians by apologising for not winning a gold or silver.
Hey Mary, thank you for staying on for so long, when you could well have been forgiven for missing the Olympics and arranging for your twin sons’ fifth birthday party on the day you fought your first bout at the Olympics.
Shuttling to Glory
In a sport where Chinese intrigue dominates, Saina Nehwal has broken through in a manner reminiscent of Prakash Padukone making his way past a wall that had bricks of Indonesian, Chinese and Danish make embedded in it.
Back in the 1980s, when Padukone ploughed a lone furrow, it was him against the dominant Indonesians and a sprinkling of Chinese and Danish stars. Now it is Saina versus the Chinese.
Four years ago, as an 18-year-old, Saina was upset and on the verge of crying as she let go of an 11-4 lead and lost in the quarter-finals of the women’s singles at Beijing. Now as a 22-year-old, she is mature beyond her years, and knows what an Olympic medal can do for her sport in India.
If she has any doubts on that, Pullela Gopichand, her coach, and one of the only two Indians to win the All England title, says, “This medal was important. Saina can and will do better, but an Olympic medal can change the face of Indian badminton. We have the depth and we need to nurse it for Rio [2016].” What he makes clear without saying it in so many words is that he also wants to take on the Chinese.
Saina got the bronze when her opponent Wang Xin conceded after the first game on account of injury. But the medal should come without an asterisk, for Saina is among the fittest in her sport and she was showing all signs of fighting her way back as she moved from 14-20 to 18-20 before losing the first game.
Saina’s performance may have overshadowed Parupalli Kashyap’s historic entry into men’s singles quarter-finals, but he has it in him to go higher. Jwala Gutta and V Diju may not have done justice to themselves in mixed doubles, but Jwala and Ashwini Ponappa came within a whisker of making the knock-outs and they had it in them to challenge for a medal for, last year they won a bronze at the same venue in World Championships.
India Can Become a World Force in Badminton
Shooting Keeps the Streak Going
Omega times it with Dicken’s bicentenary
(This story appears in the 31 August, 2012 issue of Forbes India. To visit our Archives, click here.)
INDIA in London 2012 Olympics : The pros and cons. While watching the Olympics in ESPN, STAR and DD Sports, one can see and hear often the Hero advertisement conveying best wishes to the Indian Contingent and every Indian is moved by the advertisement. Unfortunately the story ends there. The only time we Indians got a chance to listen to our National Anthem is before the start of every men's hockey match which India played and ironically India lost quite convincingly all the six games played. We Indians didn't get a chance to hear the National Anthem played not even once during the medal giving ceremony. It is not that the pride of the Nation and its people is punctured, but there needs to be some introspection so that in future our sports persons don't disappoint the common people. Let us analyze the events one by one. Hockey: The whole Nation was elated when India qualified for the London Olympics after failing to do so for the Beijing Olympics in 2008. But what a disappointment for the Indian fans! Our hockey team failed miserably in all the five league matches losing to Netherlands 3-2 (good hockey was played by India for 10 minutes when they scored two goals), New Zealand 3-1, Germany 5-2, Korea 4-1 and Belgium 3-0 and the playoff match for 11th and 12th positions losing to South Africa 3-2 thus getting the wooden spoon. This is the first time in the history of Olympic hockey that India has failed to win even one match in the tournament. What a disgrace to a Nation which regularly used to have a podium finish in the Olympics till the 70s. Now what ails Indian hockey! First let us see what our past players have to say! Jagbir Singh remarked, "It was a pain to watch a team with lot of potential playing so poorly. Its time Indian players realize that we play not for the gallery but for gold"BAD 9D2E Mir Ranjan Negi was more caustic. He expressed, "The whole nation is shocked. It is difficult to believe that India fared so poorly. Even an ordinary team from the country could have performed better than this"BAD 9D2E The coach of the team Michael Nobbs was more forthcoming and candid. He remarked, "We"ve got some players out there just wanting to be Olympians, but international hockey demands the heart for a fight. The players need to make a decision whether they are satisfied just to be Olympians and return home, or are they willing to be tough and make that commitment for the teams cause"BAD 9D2E Pargat Singh, one of the all time greats, summed up, "We shall never win if players continue to have egos and play like individuals"BAD 9D2E Watching the matches played by India, almost all viewers will agree that most of the players played for the gallery as opined by Jagbir Singh. Looking at the way most of the Indian players kept the ball to themselves without passing it to a team mate who is in a better position, the viewers often got confused as to whether hockey is a team game in which 11 players play or a one man game. So what is the remedy? Select youngsters impartially from all over the country, provide them all facilities, train them with the latest methods of coaching and imbibe in them the point that hockey is a team game and when they represent the country they are not playing for the gallery but for the pride of the Nation. Badminton: Our badminton players have done our country proud. It was really great to watch Saina Nehwal and Kashyap Parupalli play their matches. Though Kashyap lost to the world number one in the quarter-finals, he played his heart out. Saina finished with the bronze medal after giving a very good and close fight to a higher ranked player in the semi-finals. As the badminton coach Pullela Gopi Chand remarked "Saina's this achievement is a huge boost for badminton in India"BAD 9D2E Though the mixed doubles and the women's doubles teams could not perform well, overall there is a bright future for badminton in India. Saina's and Kashyap's performance is sure to encourage a host of youngsters to take up the game seriously. This has to be utilized to the maximum and we should try to have the maximum permissible number of teams and players in all the badminton events in the next Olympic games in Rio De Janeiro in 2018. Tennis: This is a game in which disaster struck much before the game started. Two of our players who have played for more than two decades and who are in the twilight of their professional carrier, Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi, took their personal like and dislike to center stage above National pride. The net result was that there was a lot of mudslinging and commotion before the final team was announced. Ultimately Paes was to partner Sania in the mixed doubles though Bhupathi and Sania won the mixed doubles in the French open 2012. This was done to appease Paes with whom both Bhupathi and Bopanna refused to partner in the men's doubles event and Paes had to partner with the lowly rated Vishnu Vardhan. Yelling that she has been used as bait in this issue, Sania extracted her pound of flesh in that the authorities had to include Sania's mother as a member of the back-up team for tennis. So everything was lost in tennis for India much before the commencement of the game and the final result was as per expected lines. What for the future! Groom a fresh group of youngsters, train them and imbibe in them the feeling that playing for the Nation is above personnel likes and dislikes. As far as sportsman spirit is concerned these youngsters should be taught to follow the footsteps of Naresh Kumar, Ramanathan Krishnan, Jaideep Mukherjee, Premjit Lal, Vijay Amirtharaj and Ramesh Krishnan. Archery: This is another game in which much was expected. However, in spite of sincere efforts by our players, we could not reach the quarterfinals in any event. This may be due to the players not getting properly acclimatized to the conditions at the venue. In the opinion of many this is one game in which India can have a bright future provided proper initiatives are taken by the concerned authorities. Archery equipments are quite expensive. The authorities should concentrate to select capable youngsters from regions like Bihar and Jharkhand for the game and provide proper equipments and training to them. Many people feel that this is one game in which India will be getting medals in the forthcoming Olympic games. Shooting: Shooting, which used to be a game mainly played by the maharajas, nawabs and their clans, has become a popular game for the common man, mainly from the armed forces, and it is one game which has been fetching medals for the country in the recent past including the London Olympics. Vijay Kumar got silver. From a neutral point of view it is felt that had Vijay Kumar shot first in the final round he would have won the gold. As his opponent began the final round scoring all 5, there was no scope for Vijay Kumar to overtake him. Narang Gagan got a bronze as it was probably not his day. This is one game which has to be encouraged continuously and this game also will be one in which India can hope to get a handful of medals in the future games. BOXING: It is a revelation that India had a number of boxers in the Olympics including one woman, Mary Kom whose indomitable effort fetched the country a bronze medal. A mother of twins her achievement is sure to encourage a number of women mainly from the north east of the country to take up this game. Our men boxers have not lagged far behind. Each of them has given his 100% in their matches. So this is another game the status quo needs to be maintained so that more medals come in the future Olympics. Wrestling: It is from our traditional akharas mainly from the central and northern parts of the country that National wrestlers emerge. Our wrestlers have been doing proud for the country. Sushil Kumar won the silver in the 66 kg freestyle competition, thus becoming the first Indian to win medals in two successive Olympics and Yogeshwar Dutt clinched the bronze medal in the 60 kg freestyle competition. He said that his body had given up but his spirit kept him going as he fought three opponents in less than an hour to clinch a bronze medal in the Olympic. That is the spirit. Our other wrestlers also fought valiantly with more superior opponents. This is another game in which our tricolor is expected to unfurl in the succeeding Olympic games. Athletics, rowing, sailing, canoeing, swimming, table tennis, etc. All our players tried their level best. But the gap between the front runners and our players is so big that it may take quite some time for our players to match the performance of the podium finishers. However, we should continue to send all those who qualify for the particular event. Overall, all is not lost. There is plenty of hope for our players to do wonders in the succeeding Olympic games. While a Vijender Singh has created interest in many in boxing, a Rathore has made many to take up shooting and a Sushil Kumar has kindred interest in wrestling in many in the recent past, a Saina will make many youngsters interested in badminton, a Mary Kom will boost boxing among women, a Vijay Kumar and Narang Gagan are sure to kindle interest in many to take up shooting and a Sushil Kumar and Yogeshwar Dutt will enthuse quite a number of athletes to take up wrestling in the near future. Of course all will depend on the proper and impartial back up provided by the concerned authorities. India is bound to shine brighter in the succeeding Olympics. Finally those who represent the country should have the Triple D that is Determination, Dedication and Diligence.
on Aug 15, 2012This comment warrants to be an article in its own right. Well done. Wonderful analysis.
on Aug 21, 2012