Winds of change with reverse auctions
New auction-based regime for wind projects has led to lower tariffs the earlier situation

Producers argued that setting up a wind site was more complex than setting up a solar site. At the same time, state electricity boards were scrambling to procure power from renewable producers. This allowed producers to get away with quoting higher tariffs.
In late 2016, the government said it intended to move from feed-in tariffs to a reverse auction method.
Why the sector faces headwindsOnce the government announced its intent to move to reverse auctions, there was a huge slowdown in orders.
States awaited clarity on the reverse auction guidelines and overnight stopped entering into any power purchase agreement. As a result, there were no auctions in the first half of the year resulting in a large inventory build-up at the manufacturers’ end.
Several faced working capital issues while they awaited clarity. When auctions for wind power were done in October, the bid received by the Solar Energy Corporation of India for 1 GW of projects was just `2.64 per unit. What next?There is still concern about the lack of clarity regarding the quantum of auctions. “The pipeline visibility is not there and this has led to a build-up of inventory. This can impact the level of innovation in the wind sector as companies cut back on research,” warns Vivek Sharma, senior director, CRISIL Infrastructure Advisory.
However, the market expects it to be business as usual once the auction process settles down. “The reverse auction mechanism has its issues. But these are temporary. As the sector matures further, and more capacity is offered up through auctions, the process should become robust and bids should become more realistic,” says Ravi Kailas, chairman, Mytrah Energy (India).
Lower margins also mean that players with lower debt can bid aggressively, leading to consolidation in the sector.
First Published: Jan 21, 2018, 06:56
Subscribe Now