In less than two years, Slack Technologies has become one of the most glistening of tech’s 10-digit “unicorn” startups, boasting 1.1 million users and a private market valuation of $2.8 billion. If you’ve used Slack’s team-based messaging software, you surely recognise that one of its catchiest innovations is Slackbot, a helpful little avatar that pops up periodically to provide tips so jaunty that it seems human.
Such creativity can’t be programmed. Instead, much of it is minted by one of Slack’s 180 employees, Anna Pickard, the 38-year-old editorial director. She earned a degree in theatre from Britain’s Manchester Metropolitan University before discovering that she hated the constant snubs of auditions that didn’t work out. After dabbling in blogging, videogame writing and cat impersonations, she found her way into tech, where she cooks up zany replies to users who type in “I love you, Slackbot”. It’s her mission, Pickard explains, “to provide users with extra bits of surprise and delight”. The pay is good; the stock options, even better.
What kind of boss hires a thwarted actress for a business-to-business software startup? Stewart Butterfield, Slack’s 43-year-old co-founder and CEO, whose estimated double-digit stake in the company could be worth $300 million or more. He’s the proud holder of an undergraduate degree in philosophy from Canada’s University of Victoria and a master’s degree from Cambridge in philosophy and the history of science.
“Studying philosophy taught me two things,” says Butterfield, sitting in his office in San Francisco’s South of Market district, a neighbourhood almost entirely dedicated to the cult of coding. “I learnt how to write really clearly. I learnt how to follow an argument all the way down, which is invaluable in running meetings. And when I studied the history of science, I learnt about the ways that everyone believes something is true—like the old notion of some kind of ether in the air propagating gravitational forces—until they realised that it wasn’t true.”
Slack’s core business benefits from the philosopher’s touch. Hardcore engineers have been trying to build knowledge-management software for at least 15 years. Most of their approaches are so cumbersome that corporate users can’t wait to quit. Slack makes everything simple. It bridges everything from Dropbox to Twitter, helping users organise documents, photos and data files into streamlined channels for easy browsing. Considering that Butterfield spent his early 20s trying to make sense of Wittgenstein’s writings, sorting out corporate knowledge might seem simple.
And he’s far from alone. Throughout the major US tech hubs, whether Silicon Valley or Seattle, Boston or Austin, Texas, software companies are discovering that liberal arts thinking makes them stronger. Engineers may still command the biggest salaries, but at disruptive juggernauts such as Facebook and Uber, the war for talent has moved to non-technical jobs, particularly sales and marketing.
The more that audacious coders dream of changing the world, the more they need to fill their companies with social alchemists who can connect with customers—and make progress seem pleasant.
Think of the ways the automobile revolution of the 1920s created enormous numbers of jobs for people who helped fit cars into everyday life: Marketers, salesmen, driving instructors, road crews and so on. Something similar is afoot today. MIT professors Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in a recent book, The Second Machine Age, that today’s tech wave will inspire a new style of work in which tech takes care of routine tasks so that people can concentrate on what mortals do best: Generating creative ideas and actions in a data-rich world.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics predicts that by 2022 some 1 million more Americans will enter the workforce as educators. Another 1.1 million newcomers will earn a living in sales. Such opportunities won’t be confined to remedial teaching or department store cashiers. Each wave of tech will create fresh demand for high-paid trainers, coaches, workshop leaders and salespeople. By contrast, software engineers’ ranks will grow by 279,500, or barely 3 percent of overall job growth. Narrowly defined tech jobs, by themselves, aren’t going to be the answer for long-term employment growth, says Michael Chui, a partner at McKinsey Global Institute.
Such nuances elude policymakers, who can’t shake the notion that tech-centred instruction is the only sure ticket to success. President Barack Obama has repeatedly called for more spending on tech-focussed high schools. In a February interview with the Re/code website, he hailed computer-programming classes as “a huge priority”, adding: “It can’t just be a handful of kids. It’s got to be everybody.”
In fact, people without a tech degree may already be benefiting the most from tech’s boom. Some fascinating insights can be found on LinkedIn, which tracks graduates of specific universities as they move into the workforce. Say hello to the 62,887 LinkedIn members who attended Northwestern University in the past decade. Now zoom in on the 3,426 who have moved to the San Francisco Bay Area, one of the most popular destinations outside the Midwest, as they chase the Silicon Valley dream. Smart call: The Wildcats’ top corporate employers include Google, Apple, Facebook, Genentech and LinkedIn.
Surprisingly, only 30 percent of these migrants ended up in engineering, research or information technology. As LinkedIn data show, most of the migrants have created non-technical career paths in Silicon Valley. The list starts with sales and marketing (14 percent) and goes on to include education (6 percent), consulting (5 percent), business development (5 percent) and a host of other specialties ranging from product management to real estate. Add up the jobs held by people who majored in psychology, history, gender studies and the like, and they quickly surpass the totals for engineering and computer science.
Run the numbers on recent graduates of Boston University, the University of Texas at Austin or any of the University of California campuses, and the hiring pattern in Silicon Valley is seen to be broadly similar. A case in point is Rachel Lee, who graduated from UC, Berkeley, with a communications degree in 2011; now she’s an account manager at Slack. She’s been at the company for barely a month but she’s already helped a construction company assimilate Slack’s software to keep track of things as varied as plaster shipments and building regulations via employee smartphones. Lee says she’s in awe of her technical colleagues who write Slack’s code. They, in turn, respect her because of her untechnical ability to “connect with end users and figure out what they want”.
In Austin, Suzy Elizondo can see tech’s new power structure every time she looks around the room during customer meetings. She has been working for five years at Phunware, which develops mobile applications for a wide variety of customers, including AT&T, the Houston airport and celebrity astrologers. When she joined the company as a design specialist after earning an advertising degree from UT Austin, she was the odd one out. Most meetings were packed with software engineers.
Now non-technical people from clients and from her own company often occupy at least half the seats. The reason: Software development keeps getting more automated. The rise of content libraries and plug-in modules means that mobile apps can be built much faster, with fewer people. But the non-technical side—getting everyone to agree on what an app should look like—is more labour-intensive than ever.
Mobile technology doesn’t only make life more convenient, observes Robert Tabb, a Phunware salesman who visits medical centres all year. Putting easy-to-use information on everyone’s smartphone also redefines a lot of people’s jobs. And that means lots of intense conversations about how big organisations should reconfigure themselves to handle these dislocations. Tabb sees this upheaval in action every time he approaches hospitals about installing mobile apps that guide patients towards their appointments, even if it’s not obvious which corridors lead from the lobby to Room C-713.
“It takes about ten meetings for us to get one of these deals put together,” Tabb says. “And only two of those meetings are about the technology.” The rest of the time Tabb earns his keep by practising shuttle diplomacy. Early on, the patient-relations specialists love his idea, but the building engineers are dubious. Once the physical mapping issues are resolved, new tensions flare up regarding the prominence—or absence—of the medical centre’s brand on the mobile app. Eventually every- one is happy, and the deal gets done.
Being able to read the room is such a crucial skill, adds Phunware sales executive Mike Snavely, that he’s willing to hire people who don’t know much about technology if they have a gift for relating to other people. It doesn’t bother him at all that Tabb started out selling running shoes or that Elizondo sells handmade jewellery at weekend crafts fairs as a hobby. Eccentricity, as least relative to the geeks coding all night in the back, sharpens people skills, he finds.
To be sure, the financial payoff of an engineering degree remains strong. A 2014 report by the American Association of Colleges & Universities found that engineering majors earned an average of about $92,000 a year in their late 30s, compared with about $61,000 for graduates with degrees in the humanities or social sciences. But strong social skills turn out to be just as important as brainpower in determining future earnings potential. Catherine Weinberger, an economist at UC, Santa Barbara, has been analysing government data on thousands of high school students and what they earn years later. Among her findings: People with balanced strengths in social and math skills earn about 10 percent more than their counterparts who are strong in only one area. In fact, socially inept math whizzes fare no better than go-getters who struggle with numbers.
Ramona has worked in restaurants for much of her 20s, helping manage everything from steak houses to sushi bars. She knows when to make small talk about radicchio and when it’s time to circle a disappointing metric on her iPad before gently saying: “There’s an opportunity here for you.”
OpenTable is a case in point of how the tech sector has widened its horizons. In the late 1990s, California chip engineer Chuck Templeton created OpenTable as a pure tech play: Enabling anyone to book a meal reservation online, instantly. The public loved it. Most eateries, however, lacked the scheduling software to make it work. So, in 2000, OpenTable began putting muscle into building better information technology for restaurants.
Suddenly, OpenTable needed salespeople. Years of selling helped it slip its software into more than 10,000 restaurants by 2008. That was a fragile triumph, however. OpenTable’s engineers kept upgrading the company’s seating systems and data analytics, only to discover that restaurateurs weren’t paying attention. That created a greater risk of customer churn. If OpenTable wanted strong, lasting connections with restaurant managers and owners, it needed a second team of frontline relationship-builders.
So OpenTable executives began hunting for people who had waited on tables, tended bars or managed restaurants earlier in their careers. The company was moving beyond its beginnings as an automation tool. The new priority, as sales chief Mike Dodson explains, was to find or train evangelists who could “show how tech can enrich the dining experience”. The influx of some 137 people like Ramona has expanded OpenTable into 32,000 restaurants, with only 14 data scientists needed to run its insight-crunching machinery.
At 4.30 pm, on a Monday, Ramona popped into Marlowe, a bistro in the San Francisco neighbourhood where Slack is based. She greeted owner Anna Weinberg, who also owns Park Tavern and another property, with a big hug. The post-work rush hadn’t started yet; Marlowe was empty. Moments later, the two women were peering at Ramona’s iPad, where a giant “opportunity” was on display. In the past year, thousands of OpenTable users had been told seats weren’t available at Park Tavern. Often, people were trying to book tables far in advance. But Weinberg’s restaurant offered only a 30-day look-ahead.
“Some people look two months out,” Ramona explained.
“Fine!” Weinberg declared. “Let’s do 60 days then. We’ll do it for all three of our restaurants.”
The next day, Ramona worked her Uber account to exhaustion, dashing into a wide variety of San Francisco cafes, bars and restaurants. At a hipster cocktail establishment, Bar Agricole, Ramona let owner Thad Vogler know that he was getting 37 percent of his online bookings from mobile users, compared with 32 percent for his peers. Vogler grinned as if he’d just hit the lottery. His restaurant had been doing a big social media push. “This kind of input is endlessly valuable,” he declared.
In theory, OpenTable could send data analysts on the road to share the same information. But Grant Parsamyan, OpenTable’s head of business intelligence, shudders at the thought. He’s a stocky man who favours plaid shirts at work. While he enjoys fine dining, he admits to being starstruck by the ways top restaurateurs project their authority. “I wouldn’t be effective at all, trying to do what Shawna does,” Parsamyan concedes.
When restaurateurs scoff at OpenTable’s analysis, Ramona earns her keep. On a recent visit to Town Hall, a San Francisco restaurant that specialises in country ham and other southern-inspired cuisine, Ramona and a colleague, Denise Capobianco, suggested that restaurant manager Bjorn Kock wasn’t doing enough to attract large groups. Kock bristled. “Our design does not lend itself to a lot of large parties,” he declared. Big groups take too long to finish, he explained. Their rush of orders strains the kitchen. Besides, his restaurant’s long, angular layout would make big tables unwelcome.
Ramona didn’t give up. “But what about trying an experiment on Sundays, when traffic is lighter. You could offer one ten-seat booking at 5 pm. That wouldn’t strain the kitchen. It might be extra business that you wouldn’t get otherwise.”
Kock nodded his head. “That could work,” he said. And thus the digital revolution spreads a tiny bit further, thanks to whiz-bang code underpinning OpenTable—and the interpersonal skills of an English major.
Check out our end of season subscription discounts with a Moneycontrol pro subscription absolutely free. Use code EOSO2021. Click here for details.
(This story appears in the 04 September, 2015 issue of Forbes India. To visit our Archives, click here.)