Top 20 happiest countries in the world in 2025
Let's explore the World Happiness Report 2025 and the secrets behind the happiest countries in the world, and also take a look at those at the bottom

In a world filled with diverse cultures, landscapes, and traditions, pursuing happiness is a universal endeavour. We all yearn for joy, contentment, and well-being. The pursuit of happiness is not just a preference it"s a fundamental part of being human.
Estimating a country"s happiness provides valuable insights into the well-being of its citizens. It helps governments, policymakers, and organisations understand the factors that contribute to people"s contentment and identify areas that may need improvement. These rankings can influence the allocation of resources and the development of policies that promote the overall quality of life.
Additionally, the metric offers a broader perspective on a nation"s success, moving beyond economic indicators to consider the social and emotional aspects of its population. Bhutan, for example, has been a pioneer in valuing happiness more than economic development. It measures the Gross National Happiness of its citizens rather than relying on economic metrics to judge the country"s prosperity. Ultimately, measuring and ranking happiness is essential for creating a more holistic and people-centred approach to societal progress.
So, which are the happiest countries in the world? What makes some nations consistently rank higher on happiness scales than others? Let’s find out.
Rank | Country | Happiness Score in 2025 | Continent |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Finland | 7.736 | Europe |
2 | Denmark | 7.521 | Europe |
3 | Iceland | 7.515 | Europe |
4 | Sweden | 7.345 | Europe |
5 | Netherlands | 7.306 | Europe |
6 | Costa Rica | 7.274 | North America (Central) |
7 | Norway | 7.262 | Europe |
8 | Israel | 7.234 | Asia |
9 | Luxembourg | 7.122 | Europe |
10 | Mexico | 6.979 | North America |
11 | Australia | 6.974 | Australia |
12 | New Zealand | 6.952 | Australia |
13 | Switzerland | 6.935 | Europe |
14 | Belgium | 6.889 | Europe |
15 | Ireland | 6.869 | Europe |
16 | Lithuania | 6.829 | Europe |
17 | Austria | 6.81 | Europe |
18 | Canada | 6.803 | North America |
19 | Slovenia | 6.792 | Europe |
20 | Czechia | 6.775 | Europe |
This drop in happiness levels is closely linked to India"s escalating mental health crisis, which has been exacerbated by the challenges posed by the Covid-19 pandemic.
The rankings of national happiness are derived from a global survey conducted by the polling company Gallup, Inc., known as the Cantril Ladder survey. In this survey, individuals are asked to envision a ladder, with a perfect life rated as ten and the worst possible life rated as 0. They are then asked to assess their current lives on this 0 to 10 scale. The report analyses these evaluations and correlates them with various life factors.
The life factor variables employed in the report reflect determinants commonly associated with disparities in national-level life evaluations. However, some variables, such as unemployment and inequality, are excluded due to the unavailability of comparable data across all countries.
The adoption of subjective measurements of well-being represents a bottom-up approach, empowering respondents to evaluate their well-being. The Cantril Ladder is valuable in this context as it allows respondents to anchor their assessment based on their perspectives.
In the report, experts from various fields, including economics, psychology, survey analysis, and national statistics, discuss how well-being measurements can effectively gauge a nation"s progress and address other related topics.
Each report is structured into chapters that delve deeper into happiness-related issues, such as mental health, the tangible benefits of happiness, the role of ethics, policy implications, and connections to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development"s (OECD) approach to measuring subjective well-being, as well as other international and national initiatives.
Starting in 2021, the World Happiness Report has argued for using WELLBYs (Well-Being-Adjusted Life-Years) as a superior measure. Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) primarily measure an individual"s health-related quality of life, while WELLBYs (Well-Being-Adjusted Life-Years) provide a broader assessment by considering overall well-being, emphasising not just health but the individual"s general life satisfaction and happiness.