Layoffs are rising globally as companies turn to AI for efficiency and cost-cutting. While beneficial in the short term, mass layoffs harm employee morale and well-being. A proposed FRAME-WORK emphasises empathy and positive employee experience during layoffs to preserve hope and resilience for the future
Layoffs have an emotional and physical impact on employees, regardless of whether they are due to technological, financial or operational efficiency.
Image: Shutterstock
Corporate layoffs have become a prevalent organisational phenomenon, affecting employees both worldwide and locally. To the extent that it would not be incorrect to refer to this phenomenon as "Layoff Tsunami." Unlike the financial crisis of 2008-2009, the underlying logic for these layoffs is change as a result of technological innovation and the shift to AI.
According to news reports, TCS has announced plans to slash 2 percent of its global workforce by 2025, which might amount to more than 12,000 individuals. Employees from industry leaders such as Amazon, Fidelity, NetApp, IBM, Google, Salesforce, HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Microsoft, Intel, and others were also affected by this "Layoff Tsunami." The figures are mind-boggling: anything from 500 to 24,500 every fiscal year. Even Indian firms such as Gupshup, VerSe Inovation, and Ola Electric have made headlines by laying off employees.
The primary justification for layoffs is leveraging AI to enhance operations, with the rest of the reasoning being the effect. This pushes corporations to reduce headcounts, restructure responsibilities, and rebalance teams' positions across worldwide locations.
Layoffs have an emotional and physical impact on employees, regardless of whether they are due to technological, financial or operational efficiency. People who remain in the organisation feel the influence. It is also an issue of business reputation. Organisations must strive for the "soft landing strategy."
Nokia learned this lesson the hard way. Impacted by the 2008 global financial crisis, Nokia made the decision to shut down its Bochum plant in Germany, which would impact 2,300 plant employees. As mentioned in a Harvard Business Review article on downsizing (2018), the decision was met with nationwide protests, hostility, and government intervention. "The shutdown cost was €200 million—more than €80,000 per laid-off employee—not including the ripple effects of the boycott and bad press." It lost market share in Germany; it was estimated that "from 2008 to 2010 Nokia lost €700 million in sales and €100 million in profits." Learning from past mistakes, in 2011, when Nokia decided to lay off employees due to restructuring the company, it implemented a process that would care for them. Various research studies show that layoffs cause voluntary turnover, low morale among survivors, low engagement, and a drop in job performance and satisfaction. Companies may see short-term gains, but they will eventually lose money due to time spent on recruitment and training, tacit knowledge, a network of relationships, and, of course, output loss in the long run.
This article has been published with permission from K J Somaiya Institute of Management. https://kjsim.somaiya.edu/en/