Is Indian business Janus faced?

Dinesh Narayanan
Published: 11, Apr 2013

An Economic Times story this morning on India Inc not joining a United Nations effort to stamp out corruption says a lot about our corporates and their value systems as citizens of a developing nation. Indian businessmen are quick to play the victim whenever government agencies go after them. Just see the way Sahara has been acting after Sebi began asking questions about its debenture issues. Remember how corporates rallied together when the Radia tapes became public.

On issues of public importance such as corruption or human rights abuses, they shy away from doing anything concrete except making token gestures and speeches. When Anna Hazare began his movement against corruption two years ago, many corporates came forward to fund him. Around the same time, a number of people, including 22 Nobel laureates, were campaigning for Dr Binayak Sen's release but not a single corporate was part of the movement.

Does this mean that Indian corporates are insensitive or they are concerned only about their profits? Perhaps not. But often their actions and statements make you suspect otherwise. For example, former CII President and Godrej group chairman Adi Godrej's statement on why no Indian company is part of the UN initiative to curb corruption shows at least a lack of earnestness.

``The United Nations is generally perceived as a diplomats' group, not one for businessmen. So if the UN Global Compact wants us to join their international working group against corruption, they should approach us through industry bodies like the CII,'' Godrej was quoted as saying. He could not have been more bureaucratic in his answer than that. If Indian companies are really serious about tackling issues, I would imagine them to jump at every available opportunity.

At the Delhi Economic Conclave organised by the finance ministry, CII and NIPFP last winter, Princeton game theoretician Avinash Dixit proposed a radical effort by corporates to stop corruption. Professor Dixit was proposing a solution on the supply side where politicians demand and companies pay bribes. He felt businesses were best placed to check this.

Dixit's solution was the business community get together and keep a watch on their own. If anyone was found to have paid a bribe to bag a contract or some other favour, he or she would be ostracised as penalty. The rest of the community will refuse to do business with him. It would be very difficult for a company to operate in isolation, Dixit had reasoned. It is somewhat akin to community members bringing on peer pressure to prevent default in micro-finance projects.

In theory the proposal sounded excellent but naive if you know Indian business. Predictably, there were sniggers in the audience comprising mostly businessmen. Scepticism arises not because Indian businessmen mistrust each other but they trust each other too much and are comfortable as a community that abides by established practice. Anyway, the cost of bribes is ultimately borne by the consumer.

That is why it is not surprising that there is no company from India to pitch in for an international effort against corruption.

  • Should we trust the political instincts of businessmen? | சவுக்கு

    [...] shown scant interest in issues beyond profits as my former colleague Dinesh Narayan pointed out here and [...]

    on Apr 18, 2014
  • dinesh narayan

    The biggest issue is politician - entrepreneur nexus in the process of generation of GDP for the nation. The complete thrust is to distribute the entire GDP among entrepreneurs and politicians and their kith and kin , by way of creating fraudalent corporate structures . Part of GDP goes to the populace only to ensure that there is no civil war.Large funds are diverted towards political objectives in the name of development funds The problem is Intention and not the action or nexus.

    on Jun 5, 2013
  • Vijay Dandapani

    "United Nations effort to stamp out corruption". There is no need to read the rest of the article. Expecting the UN to stamp out corruption is like putting Hitler in charge of a commission to stamp out genocide. There is no bigger cesspool of corruption than Turtle Bay.

    on Apr 14, 2013
  • Prasanna Srinivasan

    A lot of anti-corruption moves miss the important part. A transparent rules based system with accountability eliminates discretion in approvals and provides time-based responses. The govt changed its system of passport applications and driving licences (in Delhi) - completely eliminating the need for any "middlemen" and/or bribes. Railway ticket bookings have made life easier for us common folks. Pretending that this is just a business thing is absolutely naive, in my view. An average Indian dealing with myriad opaque govt procedures pays bribes for legitimate work. These big public initiatives that do not address systemic causes will be just that....a lot of hoopla with no real changes. Just screaming out loud and creating yet another forum is a futile exercise for real change.

    on Apr 11, 2013
P4:Modi's New Mantra for Governance in India
Innovations in Micro Finance: Field notes from Eastern Uttar Pradesh