In a democratic system, a change of regime is legitimate. It has happened in the past and will happen in the future too. Any change that takes place must be consistent with the spirit and letter of the Constitution. I say this because India is not an ordinary nation state. It has developed and evolved over a period of time. And its social structures, its intellectual and cultural lives have been nurtured by different sections of the society. All of which, though separate in many ways, have contributed to the making of India. If you forget this and begin to imagine that you can appropriate a certain legacy, and through the state machinery you can perpetuate and promote that legacy, you are already creating fissures.
The aim of any government is to strengthen the unity of the society, to ensure that the diversity of the country is preserved. And India is seen as India in a way that perhaps Jawaharlal Nehru saw in The Discovery of India—a mosaic of culture and community. I also think that the makers of the Constitution had the good sense to visualise a country during the very grim time of Independence. They could have opted for a Hindu state, which was the easiest thing to do. But they didn’t because they did not want to break the cultural and civilisational unity of the country, something that Mohammed Ali Jinnah and the Muslim League had already done.
They [the Constitution makers] wanted to keep intact whatever was left to them. And for well over three decades, they managed to do so. ‘Unity in diversity’ was not just a slogan; it conveyed the aspirations of the people, who wanted to live together and respect each other’s culture, religion and way of life.
And that is the general framework within which the future of a nation like ours has to be examined, discussed and promoted.
BJP is clearly a right-wing government and has all the faults of a right-wing government. A right-wing government is not desirable in any society, more so in a country like ours with its uneven growth. It is a different country where you have to depend on a welfare system. It is all very well for me to sit in an AC room and pontificate on how subsidies should be withdrawn. But think of the 60 percent of the population that is below the poverty line; don’t we have any obligation towards them? We talk of bringing people to the mainstream. But right-wing economic policies do everything to keep the mainstream away from the poor. So in slogan, mainstream is there, but in practice, it makes sure that the mainstream includes only the rich.
Every government has an ideology. There is nothing wrong in being ideological. But again, the ideology of a national government as against that of a state government is different; it has to be consistent with the interest of the nation. It should not reflect sectarian or communitarian interests.
But the BJP is trying to do just that. The damage has been done with the appointment of the Indian Council of Historical Research chairman [Yellapragada Sudershan Rao] who is committed to a totally different world view that is divisive. This is a pointer to what might happen later. I think we need individuals who can provide leadership and infuse dynamism in our institutions. We don’t need these kinds of ideologues who have a sectarian view on so many matters. These offices should be manned by men of academic excellence.
The whole business of inventing heroes in education has dangerous consequences. Because heroes are pitted against enemies and heroes emerge out of enemies. Fortunately, Gandhi, Nehru or Patel don’t emerge out of enemies. But Maharana Pratap does, Prithviraj Chauhan does, Shivaji does. These heroes have become exemplary in a society which is increasingly becoming polarised. So education, instead of narrowing the divide, and creating a common perspective on history and contemporary life, has led to a drift. The task of education should be to promote common citizenry. So when one votes in an election, one votes as a citizen and not as a Hindu or a Muslim or a Brahmin.
Check out our Festive offers upto Rs.1000/- off website prices on subscriptions + Gift card worth Rs 500/- from Eatbetterco.com. Click here to know more.
(This story appears in the 22 August, 2014 issue of Forbes India. To visit our Archives, click here.)
While author talks about religious diversity, only the last line hints at mishandling of linguistic diversity by the union government of India. Mishandling of linguistic diversity is being carried on by both Congress and BJP-led governments alike. Unless linguistic equality is established, and languages of 8th schedule declared as official languages of the Indian union, there will be continued trouble. Time for intellectuals to also focus on linguistic diversity of India and the mishandling of the same.on Aug 21, 2014
Nice article. BJP is possibly the worst choice we have got now if they go around communalising everything. On the other hand if they restrain for Communalism we are looking at a very well governed 5 years.on Aug 20, 2014
It is a magazine and an author is entitled to his views. We find it biased because it is different than our own. My view is that BJP is secular, not right wing. BJP supported Palestine not Israel in UNHRC. It has kept the Constitution as secular, not made it Hindu. RSS has clearly stated that it will not interfere in Govt functioning. Col Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya are illegally still in jail. We might do well to revisit why and because of whom was independence achieved. It wasnt because of Gandhi Nehru or anyone else, but because of people like Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, etc. And most importantly because of Subhash Chandra Bose and his Hind Sena. Why? British were able to rule, because Indian soldiers allowed them to. When Subhash Chandra Bose\' sena turned these feelings, Indian soldiers started turning against British. Thats when British wisely decided to leave India. Text books are what they are because of the \"secular\" Congress governments who let lies fly by for so many years. So education is safe under a sincere government, not right or left or middle wing governments FDI, non FDI, subsidy, no subsidies are policy matters and not related to right left or middle wing government. Looking at these points, I think it was a very poor articleon Aug 19, 2014
I think the author is completely biased in his views. In fact some of the issues raised like demonizing muslims in the textbooks in MP and Gujarat are completely false. It is also disappointing to see the author mentioning that it would be wrong to mention about Maharana Pratap and Shivaji Maharaj in the textbooks as they are highly polarizing figures. I think the author fails to recognize that both these leaders had advocated following any religion in their kingdom without any fear or persecution. The author feels appointing Smriti Irani as a wrong choice without any facts to justify them. He must also know that illiterate leaders like K. Kamaraj from Tamilnadu were such high visionaries and able administrators and hence this argument do not augment to the Indian diaspora.on Aug 19, 2014
The role of history books is not to create communal harmony. The books should tell us what happened in the past, the way it happened. If the mughal rulers were brutal on hindus, it should be taught in the school text books. If the Islamic invaders looted the hindu temples, killed hindu men and sexually exploited the hindu women, that should be known to everyone, more importantly those who are studying history. What is the point of of reading history which whitewashes the sins of one community and paints them as liberals? What is happening in Iraq and Syria happened in the past in India too. The Islamic invaders never let any religion to be at peace when they conquer that land. In Afghanistan, the moment Talibanis gained power, they destroyed the Bamiyan buddhas. In Iraq and Syria, when ISIS gained power, they destroyed the christian past of the countries. In Pakistan all reference to Hindu places and monuments is wiped off. And this is happening today when means of communication & dissemination of information is clearly superior. Imagine, how things would have been during the time of Islamic Invasion on India. Mushirul Hasan says it is not the duty of Government to write or rewrite the text books. Did he say the same when West Bengal Government under communists issued a clear instruction to history text book committee not to include any thing which may paint muslims bad?on Aug 19, 2014
Great article. Thanks Hill Range High Schoolon Aug 19, 2014