India@75: A nation in the making

Out Of Touch: The World Bank is A Few Steps Behind

The World Bank has made recommendations in its first review of India's anti-poverty schemes, but seems to have given ground realities a pass

Published: Jun 16, 2011 06:07:55 AM IST
Updated: Feb 21, 2014 12:21:25 PM IST



Out Of Touch: The World Bank is A Few Steps Behind

World Bank Proposal: Cash transfers in the Public Distribution System (PDS). The WB has noted that no country has a well-functioning PDS and India is no exception with only 41 percent of the grains released reaching their targets in 2004-05.

Our View: States like Chhattisgarh and Tamil Nadu have shown that the traditional system can work without cash transfers. The main reasons for leakages are poor monitoring and lack of clarity about who the ‘targeted’ population is. Cash transfers will not solve the problems. Also, data from 2008 and 2009 shows that leakages have been coming down as chief ministers realise the political benefits of a well functioning PDS.

World Bank Proposal: Expand the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) to urban areas.

Our View: Most experts outside the WB do not agree. Urban areas do not have adequate opportunities for unskilled labour and the minimum wage of Rs. 100 is unappealing. Instead, if the scheme is implemented better in villages it would relieve urban stress by holding off distress migration.

World Bank Observation: It has held up the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) as a scheme that is well designed and well implemented. The RSBY was started in 2008 and is one of the world’s largest health insurance schemes covering about 70 million.

Our View: While government data is impressive, there is little independent research on RSBY. Most researchers believe that its efficacy is critically dependent on the public health care system. “There is no point having an insurance card if there is no hospital close by,” said one economist.
World Bank Proposal: A ‘3+ Block Grant’ set-up. It means the Centre runs three key schemes like PDS, MGNREGA and RSBY and leaves the states to decide how they want to run the rest, by giving them a block grant.

Our View: Most experts believe that states are closer to the people and have more at stake when it comes to poverty alleviation. However, the suggestion ignores political reality.

World Bank Proposal: Greater emphasis on preventive programmes like RSBY, instead of protective programmes like PDS or MGNREG.  

Our View: While
more programmes that are preventive are crucial in the long-term perspective, yet, given the fact that existing poverty levels in India range between 30 percent to 50 percent of the population, they should not come at the expense of protective programmes.

Check out our Monsoon discounts on subscriptions, upto 50% off the website price, free digital access with print. Use coupon code : MON2022P for print and MON2022D for digital. Click here for details.

(This story appears in the 17 June, 2011 issue of Forbes India. To visit our Archives, click here.)

Show More
Post Your Comment
Required, will not be published
All comments are moderated
  • Anil Swarup

    There are a few factual errors in the views presented here. The RSBY has indeed been evaluated by different agencies and some of the evaluations are placed on the website Not all these evaluations are government sponsored. These evaluations do not reflect the comments as in "our views" in the paper.

    on Jun 16, 2011
    • Udit Misra

      Dear Mr Swarup, The data mentioned in the story is from the World Bank report. With regard to the independent research on RSBY, our limited point is that there is neither adequate research nor has enough time elapsed to hold up RSBY as an unqualified success. Our central point is that, notwithstanding RSBY's program design, its implementation is hampered by the poor state of health infrastructure in the country e.g. the per capita availability of hospitals, doctors and other medical facilities. In fact, one of the two independent evaluation studies available on the RSBY website, done by Mott McDonald in March 2011 makes the following observations: 1) That the "involvement of reputed healthcare facilities appears to be low in the State (Haryana). Awareness is the main reason for low utilization levels." 2) That "the awareness level of the scheme related details among the RSBY enrolled beneficiaries was found be low." 3) That "the reputation of the hospital influences the utilization of the facility even if they are under the RSBY scheme" Further, this study observes that there is need to further study for measuring RSBY's effectiveness as its Phase 1 has just completed the first year. Regards Udit Misra

      on Jun 17, 2011