Even though their work has touched several million Indians over many decades, there has seldom been any attempt to claim credit or seek publicity
Every year, after we publish the much-awaited Forbes list of the 100 Richest Indians, I invariably get letters from readers enquiring why Ratan Naval Tata’s name is missing from our list. I’ve even had a few foreign journalists based in India and abroad call me to enquire whether the unique ownership model—where a set of trusts own 66 percent of Tata Sons—was for real.
(This story appears in the 17 August, 2012 issue of Forbes India. To visit our Archives, click here.)