ZHENGZHOU, China — China is ramping up  its ability to spy on its nearly 1.4 billion people to new and  disturbing levels, giving the world a blueprint for how to build a  digital totalitarian state.
Chinese authorities are knitting together old and state-of-the-art  technologies — phone scanners, facial-recognition cameras, face and  fingerprint databases and many others — into extensive tools for  authoritarian control, according to police and private databases  examined by The New York Times.
Once combined and fully operational, the tools can help the police  grab the identities of people as they walk down the street, find out who  they are meeting with and identify who does and doesn’t belong to the  Communist Party.
The United States and other countries use some of the same techniques  to track terrorists or drug lords. Chinese cities want to use them to  track everybody.
The rollout has come at the expense of personal privacy. The Times  found that the authorities stored the personal data of millions of  people on servers unprotected by even basic security measures. It also  found that private contractors and middlemen have wide access to  personal data collected by the Chinese government.
This build-out has only just begun, but it is sweeping through  Chinese cities. The surveillance networks are controlled by local  police, as if county sheriffs in the United States ran their own  personal versions of the National Security Agency.
By themselves, none of China’s new techniques are beyond the  capabilities of the United States or other countries. But together, they  could propel China’s spying to a new level, helping its cameras and  software become smarter and more sophisticated.
This surveillance push is empowering China’s police, who have taken a  greater role in China under Xi Jinping, its top leader. It gives them a  potent way to track criminals as well as online malcontents,  sympathizers of the protest movement in Hong Kong, critics of the police  themselves and other undesirables. It often targets vulnerable groups  like migrant workers — those who stream in from the countryside to fill  China’s factories — and ethnic minority groups like the largely Muslim  Uighurs on China’s western frontier.
“Each person’s data forms a trail,” said Agnes Ouyang, a technology  worker in the southern city of Shenzhen whose attempts to raise  awareness about privacy drew scrutiny from the authorities. “It can be  used by the government and it can be used by bosses at the big companies  to track us. Our lives are worth about as much as dirt.”
‘Leave a Shadow’
The police arrived one day in April to a dingy apartment complex in  Zhengzhou, an industrial city in central China. Over three days, they  installed four cameras and two small white boxes at the gates of the  complex, which hosts cheap hotels and fly-by-night businesses.
Once activated, the system began to sniff for personal data. The  boxes — phone scanners called IMSI catchers and widely used in the West —  collected identification codes from mobile phones. The cameras recorded  faces.
On the back end, the system attempted to tie the data together, an  examination of its underlying database showed. If a face and a phone  appeared at the same place and time, the system grew more confident they  belonged to the same person.
Over four days in April, the boxes identified more than 67,000  phones. The cameras captured more than 23,000 images, from which about  8,700 unique faces were derived. Combining the disparate data sets, the  system matched about 3,000 phones with faces, with varying degrees of  confidence.
This single system is part of a citywide surveillance network  encompassing license plates, phone numbers, faces and social media  information, according to a Zhengzhou Public Security Bureau database.
Other Chinese cities are copying Zhengzhou. Since 2017, government  procurement documents and official reports show that police in the  Chinese provinces of Guizhou, Zhejiang and Henan have bought similar  systems. The police in Zigong, a mid-size city in Sichuan province,  bought 156 sets of the technology, the documents show.
In Wuhan, the police said in a procurement document that they wanted  systems that could “comprehensively collect the identity of all internet  users in public spaces, their internet behavior, their location, their  movement, and identifying information about their phones.”
“People pass and leave a shadow,” reads one brochure promoting a  similar surveillance system to Chinese police departments. “The phone  passes and leaves a number. The system connects the two.”
Even for China’s police, who enjoy broad powers to question and  detain people, this level of control is unprecedented. Tracking people  so closely once required cooperation from uncooperative institutions in  Beijing. The state-run phone companies, for example, are often reluctant  to share sensitive or lucrative data with local authorities, said  people with knowledge of the system.
Now local police are buying their own trackers. Improved technology  helps them share it up the chain of command, to the central Ministry of  Public Security in Beijing, the people said.
The surveillance networks fulfill a longtime goal of ensuring social  stability, dating to the 1989 Tiananmen Square uprising but given added  urgency by the Arab Spring protests in 2011 and 2012. In recent years,  Chinese police made use of fears of unrest to win more power and  resources.
It is not clear how well the police are using their new capabilities,  or just how effective they might be. But the potential is there.
In Zhengzhou, the police can use software to create lists of people.  They can create virtual alarms for when a person approaches a particular  location. They can get updates on people every hour or every day. They  can monitor whom those people have met with, especially if both people  are on a blacklist for some kind of infraction, from committing a crime  to skipping a debt payment.
These networks could help China hone technologies like facial  recognition. Cameras and software often have trouble recognizing faces  shot at an angle, for example. Combined with phone and identity data,  matches become easier to make, and the technology behind identifying  faces gets better.
The police are not hiding their surveillance push. Even the  perception of overwhelming surveillance can deter criminals and  dissidents alike.
At the complex in Zhengzhou, residents  were unfazed when told that the cameras and boxes were part of a  sophisticated surveillance system.
The building manager, Liang Jianzheng, said it meant he no longer had to help the police fight crime.
“I used to have to bust my butt helping the police,” Liang said. “Now they have their own cameras, and they don’t bother me."
In November, after The Times asked surveillance companies about the  system, a construction crew appeared and took down the cameras and  boxes, Liang said. They didn’t say why.
Wire and Plywood Revolt
Some residents of the Shijiachi residential complex weren’t pleased  when building management, at the behest of the police, last year  replaced their old key card locks with a state-of-the-art surveillance  system. Residents would now need to scan their faces to enter their  buildings.
“Old people said they were always at home, so it wasn’t necessary,”  said Tang Liying, the secretary of the Chinese Communist Party for the  district in eastern China. “Young people had concerns about privacy, and  didn’t think it was necessary. We did some work to persuade them, and  in the end, most people agreed.”
Those worried about privacy had a point.
Data from the Shijiachi complex was parked on an unprotected server.  Details included 482 residents’ identification numbers, names, ages,  marital and family status, and records of their membership in the  Communist Party. For those who used the facial-recognition cameras to  enter and exit, it also stored a detailed account of their comings and  goings.
Nearby networks were similarly unprotected. They held data from 31  residences in the area, with details on 8,570 people. A car-tracking  system near Shijiachi showed records for 3,456 cars and personal  information about their owners. Across China, unprotected databases hold  information on students and teachers in schools, on online activity in  internet cafes and on hotel stays and travel records.
Online data leakage is a major problem in China. Local media reports  describe how people with access to the data sell private details to  fraudsters, suspicious spouses and anyone else, sometimes for just a few  dollars per person. Leaks have become severe enough that the police  created their own company to handle data directly, skirting third-party  systems.
A wide number of people and companies have access to the data  underlying China’s mandatory identification card system through  legitimate means. Companies with police connections use faces from ID  cards to train facial-recognition systems. The card system also tracks  fingerprints, faces, ethnicity and age.
A technology contractor called  Shenfenbao, for example, had access to real-time records of every person  staying in some 1,200 hotels in the southern city of Xiamen. In a  demonstration, Lin Jiahong, a Shenfenbao salesman, searched one common  name — a Chinese equivalent of “John Smith” — and came up with three  guests, their hotels, room numbers, time of check-in, registered  address, ethnicity and age.
“Through data on our platform, we can dig out all records of a  particular person, and make a comprehensive analysis of the route of  activities of this person,” said Lin, who added that his company also  offered algorithms to flag women who check into multiple hotels in one  night for suspicion of prostitution.
Signs of a backlash are brewing. In  Shanghai, residents pushed back against a police plan to install  facial-recognition cameras in a building complex. In Zhejiang province, a  professor filed a lawsuit against a zoo after it required mandatory  facial-recognition scans for its members to get access.
In the Shijiachi residential complex, where the facial recognition  replaced key card locks, the rebellion has been powered by wire and  plywood.
On a brisk day in November, the doors of a number of buildings had  been propped open with crude doorstops, making facial scans unnecessary.
Terry Jin, a two-year resident of Shijiachi, said technology should  not cross some lines. “I think that facial recognition outside each  building is fine,” Jin said. “If they put it outside my door, that  wouldn’t be OK.”
The Cost of Saying No
Agnes Ouyang was heading to work in Shenzhen last year when two  police officers told her she had jaywalked and would need to show them  her identity card. When she refused, she said, they grabbed her roughly  and used a phone to snap a photo of her face.
Within moments, their facial-recognition system had identified her, and they issued her a ticket for about $3.
“It was all too ridiculous,” Ouyang said. “Law-enforcement officers of low moral stock have high-tech weapons.”
High-tech surveillance is reshaping Chinese life in ways small and  profound. The Communist Party has long ruled supreme, and the country  lacks a strong court system or other checks against government  overreach. But outside the realm of politics, Chinese life could be  freewheeling and chaotic thanks to lax enforcement or indifferent  officials.
Those days may be coming to an end. In the realms of consumer safety  and the environment, that could make life better. But it has given the  police new powers to control the people.
“The whole bureaucratic system is broken,” said Borge Bakken, a  professor at Australian National University who studies China’s police.  “Under Xi Jinping, we’re seeing the flowering of a police state.”
Chinese police now boast that facial-recognition systems regularly  catch crooks. At a tourist island in the picturesque port city of  Xiamen, authorities say they use facial recognition to catch unlicensed  tour guides. Shanghai police have begun using helmets with a camera  embedded in the front. Databases and procurement documents also show  they search out the mentally ill, people with a history of drug use or  government gadflies.
Some new claims are outlandish, such as  software that claims to read emotion and criminal intent from a face.  But the surveillance net that the police have rolled out in Xinjiang, a  region of northwestern China that is home to many predominantly Muslim  ethnic groups, shows the vast potential for the rest of the country.
The police have blanketed the region in cameras, phone trackers and  sensor-studded checkpoints. In Urumqi, the regional capital, the police  sealed off 3,640 residential complexes with checkpoints and installed  18,464 sets of facial-recognition cameras in them, according to data  unveiled at a police presentation in August given by Li Yabin, a top  police official in Xinjiang. In the southern Xinjiang city of Kashgar,  The New York Times tallied a dense network of 37 phone trackers  installed permanently in a single, square-kilometer neighborhood.
Ouyang, the woman ticketed for  jaywalking, knew the dangers, but took her complaints public anyway. She  posted an account of her run-in with the police on WeChat, the Chinese  social media outlet, at 11 p.m. By the time she went to work the next  morning, it had been seen tens of thousands of times. Then it vanished.
After she saw the police treat another woman the same way, Ouyang wrote a second post. It came down in just two hours.
Then the police called and demanded a meeting.
“I said, ‘How did you find me?’” Ouyang said. “He said, ‘It’s easy for the police to find a person.’”
Fearful, she asked a friend to accompany her and chose to meet the  police at a Starbucks instead of the police station. Two officers bought  them coffee and gave her a phone number to call if she had future  complaints. But mostly, they said, she needed to keep quiet. Her post  had been seen by higher-up officials and embarrassed the city’s police,  they said.
Ouyang said the experience was one sign of an authoritarian turn  within China, and that some of her friends quietly talk about leaving.  She has no plans to leave, she says, but she worries about her future in  a country where everything is watched and controlled.
“You’re uncomfortable with it,” she said. “But if you don’t do it,  then there’s no possibility of living a life. There’s no way out.”