Investigators should put consideration of an attack "at the top of their agenda," said Peter Goelz, a former managing director of the National Transportation Safety Board
The mood in Tehran was tense Wednesday morning when Ukraine International Flight 752 took off, bound for Kyiv. Just hours earlier, Iran had fired missiles at two bases in Iraq that house U.S. troops, and Iranian forces were on alert for an American counterstrike.
Nothing was unusual about the plane’s takeoff and ascent, according to preliminary satellite data. But minutes into the flight, the Boeing 737 was engulfed in flames as it plunged to the ground, killing at least 176 people on board.
In the best of circumstances, determining the cause of an international plane crash can take a year or more of difficult investigative work and involve investigators from multiple governments. Resolving what happened over the skies of Tehran may prove even more complicated given the tensions between Iran, where the plane went down, and the United States, where it was built by Boeing, a company in the midst of crisis after two earlier deadly accidents involving another 737 model.
The immediate aftermath of the crash brought confusing and contradictory statements from Ukraine and Iran. Ukraine’s embassy in Iran initially issued a statement ruling out terrorism or a rocket attack. But the statement was later removed from the embassy’s website and replaced with one saying it was too early to draw any conclusions.
“All possible versions of what occurred must be examined,” President Volodymyr Zelenskiy of Ukraine said in a Facebook post, adding that Ukrainian experts would travel to Tehran to investigate and recover the bodies of Ukrainians.
The uncertainty could also ripple through the aviation industry, which relies heavily on the 737-NG for commercial travel. And for Boeing, the crash is the latest in a series of devastating events that have roiled the company since the first 737 Max disaster in Indonesia in late 2018.
©2019 New York Times News Service