Image: Shutterstock
At Ambit, we spend a lot of time reading articles that cover a wide gamut of topics, ranging from zeitgeist to futuristic, and encapsulate them in our weekly ‘Ten Interesting Things’ product. Some of the most fascinating topics covered this week are: Education (B-schools face a moment of reckoning; Teacher who decided to 'unschool' her own children), Business (Kat Cole on brand, leadership and more; Sculpt yourself into a future-ready leader), Technology (Fear of robots returning to work) and Productivity (Tips to help with work-from-home burnout; 9 tips to avoid procrastinating). Here are the ten most interesting pieces that we read this week, ended August 07, 2020- 1) B-schools face a moment of reckoning [Source: Livemint]2) Kat Cole – How to Operate: Lessons in Brand, Distribution, and Leadership [Source: investorfieldguide.com]
If you are trying to figure out how to understand people in your business, work around making a brand successful, then this podcast is what you got to listen to. Kat Cole, the COO and president of North America for Focus Brands, which owns famous companies like Cinnabon, Carvel, Jamba, and more, shares her story from being a waitress to now president of a multinational firm. Kat’s story and career trajectory are remarkable, as are the lessons she’s picked up along the way which she shares in this conversation.
In this podcast, she throws light upon negotiation, distribution, brand building, brand extension strategies, and leadership. She looks at the world through her positivity lens and that’s what she starts with in this podcast. She believes every person is important no matter who that person is. Getting a person interested in you is by ensuring that you are interested in the other person. This lesson has taught her a lot in terms of brand building as well.
Talking about the biggest lessons she has learnt in leadership, she briefly touches upon two points: 1) Staying super-close to the action, and 2) To find patterns and use that to use for prioritization. On balancing gratitude and satisfaction/ambition she says that she has always had an allergic reaction to the word ambition. She has always been driven by different things, and driven to be different. Lastly she says that one needs to be ambitious and driven, but you also have to enjoy the journey. Being only ambitious and driven won’t help.
3) Employees and employers both face trade-offs as offices reopen [Source: The Economist]
Covid-19 has disrupted everyone’s routine. For the past four months people were getting accustomed to the new normal. With offices now reopening, employers and employees will find it difficult to adjust to the new working conditions. A group of academics led by Ethan Bernstein of Harvard Business School has been surveying American workers during the crisis. It found that many felt they could be just as productive at home as they had been at the office. They also found that stress levels have fallen by more than 10%. That despite the fact that workers toil for longer: an analysis of one technology company showed that working hours have increased by 10-20% during the pandemic.
The emotion that is most likely to lure workers back to the office is paranoia. The pandemic may have caused managers to realise who is indispensable and who isn’t. The trade-off for employers is rather different. Most companies will be thinking about whether they need all that expensive office space. If they do want to lure back their employees, they may have to spend a lot on contactless, socially distant office design to keep their workers safe, such as doors that open automatically.
It is not always easy even for those who have been doing their job for a while to perform the same tasks at home. And newcomers must adjust to a firm’s culture, which usually happens by picking up subtle cues from the people around them. Given the state of the global economy it will take time before most companies hire a lot more employees or lower employee interaction weighs on corporate performance. With many employees happy to work from home, that may mean no great rush to repopulate the office. You may not have to resume your morning routine until 2021.
4) The fear of robots displacing workers has returned [Source: The Economist]
With lockdowns over lockdowns, companies are mulling over having robots in their factories, wherever possible. Among the many breathless headlines prompted by the pandemic are those warning of a new wave of job-destroying automation. The pace of automation in some parts of the economy, like factory floors and warehouses, is almost certain to accelerate. Yet on the whole, robot-induced mass unemployment should remain near the bottom of workers’ lists of worries. Fretting about robots in a downturn is not entirely irrational: firms appear to do most of their job-slashing during slumps.
What everyone needs to understand is that the pace of automation is likely to be gradual rather than disruptively speedy. Many jobs, even those commonly classified as “low-skilled”, require manual and social dexterity that machines cannot yet match. Some things won’t change even after the pandemic. Surveys of firms indicate that some of the shift will not be reversed. If remote work slashes overheads and enables people to move to cheaper cities, it could preserve jobs, by alleviating cost pressures on struggling firms. The pandemic has sped the adoption of technology in labour-intensive sectors like education and health care. Telemedicine and distance learning might mean that fewer doctors and teachers can serve more patients and students.
Years of economic dysfunction have energised campaigns for higher minimum wages and a more generous welfare state. The economic devastation wrought by the pandemic lends them momentum; like past crises, it could lay the groundwork for a new social contract. If post-pandemic policy were to enable workers to enjoy more security on fewer hours worked, firms might then face some genuine labour scarcity. And that would really work up an appetite for disruption.
9) Baby boomers are experiencing greater cognitive decline than previous generations, study finds [Source: gizmodo.com]
A study found out that baby boomers will not only be more likely to develop conditions like dementia than past cohorts, but future aging generations may be at a similar heightened risk. The study, published in The Journals of Gerontology: Series B late last month, looked at the cognitive test scores of over 30,000 Americans over the age of 50 who were enrolled in an existing, long-running research project by the University of Michigan, called the Health and Retirement Survey. The study had data for the following cohorts: Greatest Generation (born 1890-1923); Early Children of Depression (born 1924-1930); Late Children of Depression (born 1931-1941); War Babies (born 1942-1947); early baby boomers (born 1948–1953); and mid baby boomers (born 1954–1959).
While each generation before the boomers had improved later-life cognition compared to the one before it, the boomers showed a decline compared to war babies, breaking the pattern of improvement. “It is shocking to see this decline in cognitive functioning among baby boomers after generations of increases in test scores,” said the study author Hui Zheng, professor of sociology at The Ohio State University. “But what was most surprising to me is that this decline is seen in all groups: men and women, across all races and ethnicities and across all education, income and wealth levels.”
The Alzheimer’s Association estimates that the number of Americans over age 65 with Alzheimer’s may grow to 13.8 million by 2050, up from the 5.8 million believed to have the disease now. It’s possible, according to Zheng, that the problem could be even worse than we think. At the same time, Zheng doesn’t think that we’re necessarily doomed. “Cognitive functioning may continue declining among baby boomers if no effective interventions and policy responses are in place, which may cause the prevalence of dementia to substantially increase in the coming decades,” he said. “But this is not an irreversible trend.” Zheng suggested that everyone can strive for more physical activity, a healthy diet, and strong social bonds to lower their risk of cognitive decline later in life.