If we think it is necessary to (re)think about innovation with spiritual exercises, to what extent should Confucianist philosophy, for example, which is dominant in Asia, not be a way to follow?
Behind Confucian philosophy there is a great relationship with individual responsibility. We can improve, we can comply with what is right, so we are responsible for what we do​
Image : Mary Dimitripoulou / Shutterstock
Korean, Japanese, and especially Chinese organizations have an increasingly equal weight to their counterparts in the West, but above all their current investments, especially in research and development, will lead them to surpass them in the near future. For example, between 2007 and 2015, that is, in less than eight years, Asia became the continent that spent the most on research and development ($166 billion for 2015 alone). Between 2017 and 2018, China increased its spending on research and development by more than 34%. So-called "unicorn" companies are seen as much in Asia as in the United States and patenting has never been so important in China as in recent years. India and China represent a third of the world's population, and this population, more broadly in Asia, will grow exponentially by 2030, mainly among the middle classes. This segment of the population will begin to be able to access what the middle classes of the West already have at their disposal: telephones, refrigerators, cars, air conditioning, i.e. a large number of objects that are often polluting and not recycled. How can we cope with the increase in this demand? What tools and techniques do we need to develop to meet needs without stifling the planet?