India's digital public infrastructure has delivered mixed results. What separates runaway successes like Aadhaar and UPI from under-leveraged platforms? The answer lies in purposeful design, centralised orchestration, and a clear reason to use it
In both Aadhaar and UPI, centralised orchestration met a pressing need. Scale followed, not as an accident, but by design.
Image: Shutterstock
India has emerged as a global pioneer in building Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI). Aadhaar, Unified Payments Interface (UPI), DigiLocker, Account Aggregator (AA), Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC), and Digital Infrastructure for Knowledge Sharing (DIKSHA) are bold initiatives designed to create population-scale digital systems to solve complex public problems. Yet, their outcomes have been mixed. While Aadhaar and UPI have seen widespread adoption and impact, others like DigiLocker, AA, ONDC, and DIKSHA are still in various stages of evolution.
What explains this divergence? The core hypothesis is this: centralised orchestration, combined with a compelling use case, is the primary driver of successful DPI adoption. In contrast, infrastructures that rely on ecosystem-driven, ground-up adoption tend to require longer timelines and more coordination to scale effectively.
Similarly, UPI began as a top-down initiative of the Reserve Bank of India and NPCI. Its success was driven by government backing, regulatory alignment, and a highly relatable use case—instant, mobile-friendly payments. The growth of merchant payments was further enabled by a ubiquitous, QR code-based, asset-lite acceptance infrastructure. UPI also benefitted from favourable timing: demonetisation, rapid smartphone adoption, low mobile data costs, and private sector innovation from players like Google Pay, PhonePe, and Paytm. The result: over 185 billion transactions worth ₹280 trillion in FY 2024–25.
Crucially, UPI was built as a neutral public rail—equally accessible to banks, fintechs, big tech platforms, and even small merchants seeking to accept digital payments. It represents a combinatorial innovation, seamlessly stitching together four core elements: instant payments, APIs and SDKs, third-party payment initiation, and QR codes. Its API-based architecture enabled rapid innovation while maintaining trust, security, and consistency. The low-cost, QR-based acceptance infrastructure further democratised access. This purposeful orchestration ensured scale, inclusiveness, and resilience across the digital payment ecosystem.
In both Aadhaar and UPI, centralised orchestration met a pressing need. Scale followed, not as an accident, but by design.
[This article has been published with permission from IIM Bangalore. www.iimb.ac.in Views expressed are personal.]