In a study of the three largest oil and gas basins in the United States, the researchers found that the practice, known as flaring, often doesn't completely burn the methane, a potent heat-trapping gas that is often a byproduct of oil production
A flare in the Permian Basin in Coyanosa, Texas, on Aug. 12, 2020. Methane is a stronger, though shorter-lived, greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. (Jessica Lutz/The New York Times)
The oil industry practice of burning unwanted methane is less effective than previously assumed, scientists said Thursday, resulting in new estimates for U.S. releases of greenhouse gas that are about five times as high than earlier ones.
In a study of the three largest oil and gas basins in the United States, the researchers found that the practice, known as flaring, often doesn’t completely burn the methane, a potent heat-trapping gas that is often a byproduct of oil production. And in many cases, they discovered, flares are extinguished and not reignited, so all the methane escapes into the atmosphere.
Improving efficiency and ensuring that all flares remain lit would result in annual emissions reductions in the United States equal to taking nearly 3 million cars off the road each year, the scientists said.
“Flares have been kind of ‘out of sight, out of mind,’” said one of the researchers, Eric A. Kort, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Michigan. “But they actually matter more for climate than we realized.”
“So if we clean up our act with these flares, we actually would have a much more positive climate impact than we would have realized initially,” Kort said.
©2019 New York Times News Service