José Azar sheds light on the nuances of raising the minimum wage in different labor markets
Image: Shutterstock
In the ongoing debate over the economic impact of raising the minimum wage, one question continues to dominate: Does it cost jobs? Previous studies have found that — contrary to what some economists expected — raising the minimum wage does not always result in lower employment rates. But why is that?
In our research published in The Review of Economic Studies, my co-authors and I conclude that it depends on labor market concentration. We found that in areas where a few employers dominate hiring, raising the minimum wage can lead to increased employment. Conversely, in markets with many employers, the same policy can result in neutral or slightly reduced employment rates.
These findings can have significant implications for policymakers, who should consider labor market concentration when assessing potential employment effects of minimum wage policies.
Our empirical data looked at the effects of minimum wage increases across the U.S., where minimum wage laws differ from state to state. In particular, we analyzed job postings and earnings records from 2010 to 2016 for sectors where low-wage work is prevalent, such as retail and fast food.
We found that in highly concentrated markets (with few employers hiring and many workers in need of jobs) companies tend to have more power over wages — which leads to paying workers below their productivity value. So, increasing the minimum wage — and therefore, workers’ salaries — in those contexts won’t result in a loss of employment because the companies have an economic margin to work with. A higher minimum wage, in those contexts, also prompts more people to join the workforce.
[This article has been reproduced with permission from IESE Business School. www.iese.edu/ Views expressed are personal.]